>I hold his enthusiasms, his fervors against him. He demolished so many idols only to replace them with others: a false iconoclast, with adolescent aspects and a certain virginity, a certain innocence inherent in his solitary's career. He observed men only from a distance. Had he come closer, he could have neither conceived nor promulgated the superman, that preposterous, laughable, even grotesque chimera, a crotchet which could occur only to a mind without time to age, to know the long serene disgust of detachment.Kek, This is the best criticism against Nietzsche
>>24852074the best answer is, Cioran remains a disciple of the N
>>24852074>This is the best criticism against Nietzschehow? it's just asserting, 'he's wrong, because he doesn't know everything is meaningless, unlike me.' it's very easy to call people naive. not a very interesting criticism, though.
>>24852125hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm no.
>>24852129Cioran is right. Anyone who has lived among people would laugh at Nietzsche's virginity
>>24852135why are the people around you the test of Nietzsche's ideas?
These are just two competing bliks.
>>24852139Feel free to test it on the people around you. People are mediocre. Cioran one time wrote that where are massacres and random bouts of violence which ought to erupt because people live in cramped up places in cities. These don't happen because human is midwit.
>>24852156>People are mediocre.All the easier to be a god among them.
>>24852156>the bell curve is... bell-shaped???
>>24852156Or maybe people just dont want to kill their neighbors when things are a little tight.
