it's like this guy grew two extra cocks just so that he could rape hegel, kant, and heidegger simultaneously while writing this
Adorno wouldn’t have known what to do with his pecker if you gave him an instruction manual. In fact, he’d probably assume you were trying to transform him into a fascist.
>>24854309>Adorno had at least two affairs with other women during more than forty years of marriage to Gretel, including a long-term affair with Charlotte Alexander during their years in Los Angeles,[2] as well as an encounter with a woman known as "Carol" which is detailed in a diary entry.[4] Adorno's biographer, Stefan Müller-Doohm, cites several additional affairs, including an extramarital relationship with Reneé Nell during their years in L.A.,[2]:302–303 a lawyer called 'Eva,' and a family friend called 'Arlette' who travelled with them on holiday to Switzerland.[2]:62–63 Not only did Adorno write about his affairs and sexual fantasies about other women in his dream notes, diary, and in detailed letters to his mother,[4] Gretel Adorno was herself involved in typing out various documents of this nature, and the couple did explicitly discuss some of the extended affairs.this guy cucked his own wife. sounds like potent vril to me
>>24854223Why cant he just rape each of them in turn? Like a normal rapist.
>>24854223I figured you would try. In a different book Adorno credits Nietzsche as an elite dialectician despite his explicit complaints about it. Nietzsche's high volatility throughout his works gives him entry to almost every topic. The issue Nietzsche always runs into is that he frequently can't relinquish his initial paradox, or he tries to put the entire issue in paradox at the start. For anyone reconstructing Nietzsche this means he didn't evade Descartes/Hume. The only way Nietzsche can end on Descartes is if he can verify he will be the last one, if he ends on Hume then there isn't a resolution. This is mostly a social reading of Nietzsche, no offense Adorno anon, it's actually a really good social reading on Nietzsche, especially for anyone who can recognize his dialectic potential. On the scientific side Nietzsche still has the same issue but the exception is that he doesn't have to verify whether he will go last, Nietzsche can always opt for Hume and perform a scientific demonstration at any point, he can also opt for Descartes but if he does then he doesn't need any particular entry or exit point and doesn't have to perform a true absolute. The also means Nietzsche can resolve on the scientific side. >Fagcartes >it's all homo>always has been.
>>24854336Wtf Adorno was a Chad?
>>24854223most jüdisch post all year round
>>24854870Yup.Someone should make a "Chad Adorno VS Virgin Benjamin" picture.
>Kant and hegel are wrong because it led to the holocaustYeah, that's not strong enough an argument for me, Mr Scheckelberg.
>>24855094>[reductionist strawman]>[antisemitic trope]
