I need some recs for "Misogynistic", anti-women, anti-feminist, etc. FICTION, but non fiction can also pass. Novels and novellas that explore female behaviour and the extent of their evil and stupidity and critique them
>>24855226Its the only book that comes to my mind.
>>24855226The Manipulated Man.
>>24855226Anon, dont make your mama cry.
>>24855226Madamebovary
>>24855235>"Men have been trained and conditioned by women, not unlike the way Pavlov conditioned his dogs, into becoming their slaves. As compensation for their labours men are given periodic use of a woman's vagina."
>>24855238>The book contends that young boys are encouraged to associate their masculinity with their ability to be sexually intimate with a woman, and that a woman can control a man by socially empowering herself to be the gate-keeper to his sense of masculinity. Vilar states that this has been going on for some time.
>>24855238>>24855241Are Andrew tate and all the redpill brothers manipulated men?
>>24855226what's the meaning of the image on the left?
>>24855243Yup. They all value acess to pussy over anything else, and dream of one day being a house negro work horse for a female massa.
>>24855243Yes, they are slaves to their passions and appetites rather than partakers in the Logos.
>>24855226Montherlant, The Girls
>>24855246Kek>>24855248Haven't read this book. Seems interesting. Have you ever read Eurigena Periphyseon?
>>24855250>Montherlant, The GirlsFound about it recently thanks to /lit/, I'll read it soon
>>24855226https://archived.moe/lit/thread/23056285
>>24855258I find pic related a particularly disgusting trait of women
>>24855250>heartfelt love letters from fangirlsUnrealistic in current year. Can't imagine a modern woman -- who has been bombarded with compliments on social media since she was eleven -- writing something so heartfelt and desperate to a man.
>>24855226Anything by Bret Easton Ellis>protip: every faggot secretly hates women, has no need for them, and wants to replace them. You'll never see fags ands fagettes in the same clubs/places together (notice how homosexual men and homosexual women never interact).He was a proto-post-ironic writer.
>>24855290noooo! this and fight club are surely critiques on toxic masculinity!
>>24855238>>24855241China will destroy the longhouse by making anime sexbots that can bear children through artificial wombs
>>24855235>>24855238>>24855241Bro should have called his book what no pussy do to a mf ong bruh
>>24855311>his
Wheel of Time series can be viewed as a misogynistic fantasy series.Basically, the world is ruled by women, and everything is going to shit as a result. A lot of the female characters are unbearable cunts. Women spend most of their time uselessly tugging on their braids or crossing their arms under their breasts. The only person who can save the world is a male. And the only reason men are oppressed is because they tried to save the world once, and succeeded, but the consequence of that was they all went insane.
>>24855296>noooo! this and fight club are surely critiques on toxic masculinity!kek
>>24855313Fantasy book covers don't have SOVL like these anymore.
Good morning
>>24855226madame bovaryvanity fair
>>24855226Why bother?
Jude the Obscure
>>24855226Not misogynistic, but it's from the prophet of God itself, concerning women.Alhamdulilah
The (jah.tah.kah) tales from buddhism has funny quotes
>>24855313>And the only reason men are oppressed is because they tried to save the world once, and succeeded, but the consequence of that was they all went insane.They would have succeeded, except that women fucked everything up by refusing to ever take responsibility for anything or even just do anything useful in general.
>>24855226Tolstoy's The Kreutzer Sonata. Written during his later life, mirroring his own marriage
>>24855390The most brutal dissection tool known to man. It's crazy that this book hasn't been banned
>>24855390>Tolstoy's The Kreutzer SonataDamn this looks very good, thanks for rec
Schopenhauer 'On Women' and Otto Weininger 'Sex and Character' are the only ones you really need.>>24855235This book is dogshit. I don't know why people keep recommending it. It only criticizes "trad" women and keeps spouting the stupidest of bullshit about men and religion. It's not because the book was written by a woman that it's a good critique. She's still a dumb broad. It only shows you that women are too stupid to even understand themselves
>>24855226why so orange?
>>24855462The principles of manipulation apply to all women albeit at different intensities. Even the hyper feminist expects you to earn more than her and pay for everything and will use access to sex as a rewards based training method à la Pavlov and his dogs.
>>24855282Cute. Reminds me of the letters of the teenage girl to Matzneff in Les moins de seize ans. Which, you'll say, won't occur again either.
>>24855230Put a wig on that pig and it looks exactly like the foid in OP
>>24855296kek good one anon. always laughing when people start talking about muh media literacy because they parrot other's points of view.
>>24855278That's because you're beta.
>>24855490Kek true
>>24855246>Me constantly dreaming of women all dayI gotta get out of the slave mind mentality
>>24855296>>24855246>>24855490Fucking kek Kino thread
>>24855471How your experience with women outside of relationships? I have found them nice, at least few of them.
"Hey chud, your favorite book is actually about why my political beliefs are correct, and yours are incorrect. Crazy coincidence it might seem, but trust me, it's true."
>>24855501Not that anon but ive yelled at women in the past and it didnt make happy in anyway whatsoever. I dont like being agitated. If you like yelling at women because it makes them aroused (?) you just might be an ape without the actual divine human soul
>>24855521I've had a few female friends and it was great. I could confess problems to them and be vulnerable in a way that I wouldn't be able to with a girlfriend or a male friend. Sometimes I was even given gifts. Somehow women treat their male friends better than their romantic partners. I think it's because they subconsciously consider access to their vaginas as an expense and then expect compensation for that access.
>>24855533>I think it's because they subconsciously consider access to their vaginas as an expense and then expect compensation for that access.Right on the money I was very spooked of female gender but friendships with them are pretty alright.
>>24855226I hate that video so much.
>>24855226Women need to go back to dressing for the "male gaze". To answer your question, the enlightened one does not seek out "misogynist" literature, one simply rejects all literature that does not put women in their place.
>>24855498>>24855505>>24855516KEK this is so BASED put me in the r/4chan screencap fellow BASED PEDES.
>>24855258Damn
>>24855226This AGAIN?Go back to /r9k/ or go check your buzzwords on warosu, fuckface.
>>24855531yup, beta
>>24855226