How do you respond without sounding mad?
>>24855598I agree with him and proceed to add that language has been gerrymandered into little fiefdoms consisting of experts who deliberately use obscure language to keep you confused not unlike various philosophers. Positivists, however, are alright in my book.
>>24855598Only christcukes think he's wrong, that all that matters in this world has already been told through one book, and any scientific mystery is simply unimportant as compared to thy soul and eternal rest.
>>24855716>christcukesrepent, for the kingdom of God is at hand
>>24855598saying that the primordial state of the universe is chaos rather than order is just a fact
>>24855738Kek
>>24855738Get in
>>24855738Proves the point, does this based christcuke care about facts ?
>>24855716Rent free
why would i be mad
>>24855598>read a stupid pseud comment of flowery bullshit>think 'this sounds like something a fucking fr*nchman would say'>bruno latourgod I hate being right all the time
>>24855716fair, but his concept of nature and culture being intertwined and the perception of their division in history being false is pretty apt.I have a crucifix dangling above my computer desk hanging off a picture of Jesus with St.Paul and St. Aquinas. go figure.
>>24856340no, you figure it for me
>>24856426suit yourself
