Is this too hard? I haven't much previous knowledge in philosophy. Should I wait and read it only when ive become more knowledgeable?
>>24861441Have you ever spent all day punching a cash register at a shitty job before? that's all you need. Although apparently it was a rejection of Kierkegaard, I don't see it as a dialogue.
>>24861441Not really, but if you haven't read such literature before in your life you'll have some struggle because the whole book in an unstoppable stream of consciousness and you HAVE TO takes notes while reading it. The whole idea itself is not hard to understand, if you want to check an easier version of the book than watch "Everything Everywhere All at Once", it quotes the book literally
>>24861441Not a difficult book, Camus is barely a philosopher.
>>24861558>>24861791>>24862924That's weird. A lot of people on reddit said it was a really difficult read and not written for the layman at all. Search it if you don't believe me. The first result will be a reddit thread saying just that.
its 2 pages long.
>>24861441I'd call it comparable in difficulty to Nietzsche, so like medium level. It's mainly because it's written in a somewhat annoying style, the concepts themselves aren't that hard to grasp. Like this anon said >>24861791 you will want to take notes as you read. However I think EEAAO sucks ass, so I'd recommend reading pic related instead.
