Should I read Capitalist Realism? Is it worth it?
>>24862469I don’t get questions like this. Just start reading it, if you get bored then stop and move on
>>24862470Makes sense, thank you
>>24862469only if you've already read all worthwhile marxist texts and you want to read liberal slop
>>24862470I think he wants to know if the information has become outclassed by another book or if it's still relevant for modern political dialectic.
>>24862476What titles would you recommend that fit the description of worthwhile Marxist texts?
>>24862480
>>24862469No. Fisher is Satan.
>>24862469>AAAAAH I CAN’T ESCAPE CAPITALISM >BUY MY BOOK WHERE I WHINE ABOUT IT>WAIT I FOUND A WAY OUT JUST FOLLOW ME COMRADES! JUST TIE A ROPE LIKE THIS AND.. ACK!The “intelligensia” at work.
>>24862476>all worthwhile marxist textsthere's no such thing
>>24863880Ahem…
Nope. The first economics text a neophyte should read is pic related. It is simply not possible to have any framework of econ without understanding its very foundation (monetary theory), and then once you do, you realize outmoded thinking like Marx or Smith or Krugman or 90% of economic thought and teaching is simply not relevant.
