[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G4_3T_6XwAArSXv.jpg (188 KB, 771x900)
188 KB
188 KB JPG
Is reading books a feminine hobby?
>>
Reading children’s books and romance novels is yes. Oh and contemporary realist novels about pursuing a masters while brown
>>
>>24862670
How is life with seething when being reminded that women exist?
>>
In the "manga" segment everything falls apart; It's clear that either most people who read manga are men or it is even, and something similar could be said about the "science-fiction" segment. So this means that goodreads is mostly used by women and the results don't correlate to the real percentages of reading habits outside goodreads. However, it might be significative to see the relative interests of the sexes: if science fiction is even in this study, it probably means that outside goodreads an overwhelming majority of the people who read science fiction are men, and if there's a not so overwhelming majority of women doing reviews of classics in goodreads, it probably means that in reality it is even or maybe a little more leaning towards men.
>>
>>24862664
unfortunately, these stats are no longer reliable because of the ability to self report and the prevalence of retarded males who pretend they are women in online spaces
>>
>>24862788
Isn't it crazy how the vast majority of trannies are literally just dudes pretending on the Internet? It creates this fake consensus that gives the more mentally ill ones courage to go outside dressed as a woman.

Hey trannies, is there a name for this? People who pretend to be trans online, but put on their work boots and report to Larry's autobody shop like a normal Joe in real life?
>>
>>24862724
I just finished reading a Helen DeWitt novel. I’m just accurately describing what women mostly read. It’s right there on the graph. I do mostly hate them though
>>
>>24862664
I assume all of those female sci-fi readers are """female"""
>>
>>24862799
TRVTH NVKE
>>
>>24862664
No lifting weights is
>>
>over 50% of history book reviewers are female
Actually surprising, what periods of /his/tory are women usually interested in?
>>
>>24862766
yeah, without the ability to slice up the data we can only make very rudimentary inferences
I'd be very curious to see what things look like if we considered books by male authors only and disqualified all reviews by users with more than 1000 followers
>>
>>24862664
No, leaving reviews on goodreads about them is



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.