Dolores wasn't a heckin groomed abused victim, she was a knowing minx whore slut that knew exactly what she was doing and abused Humbert and exploited him, then left the only man that loved her so she could be a porn star and get pregnant with another mans child
>>24863160>I believe the narrator!
>>24863160ouch the edge
>>24863187>>24863208Why do Americans get so hard filtered by the concept of a knowing, consenting, sexually aggressive child?
>>24863336they have forgotten the consequences of war in their homeland
>>24863336even adults are too retarded to "consent." that's why consent is a meaningless concept.
>>24863336As a resident Burger because we want our women to be retarded, esoterically speaking.
An older man can’t consent to sex with a much younger woman because he is rendered cognitively disabled by his lust,; therefore she is a predator and a rapist
>>24863187>he fell for the "unreliable narrator" English major argument lol
>>24863187>he's unreliable because this art makes me disturbed and uncomfortable
>>24863160Truth nuke.>>24863187He doesn't even blame her himself, retard.
>>24863160I know this is a ragebait thread but she only did that INITIALLY. After the first time they did it, he took it too far and continuously raped her while she despised him.
>>24863160Translating it into *nglish was a huge mistake. *gnlo mind cannot comprehend anything which isn't puritanism (or something).
>>24863336Because what you is a pedophile delusion. And if there are teenagers who seek sex with adults, it's the duty of a normal well adjusted adult to refuse. Dealing with teenagers is like dealing with horny toddlers. You have to be fucked up in the head in the first place to want to do anything with that. I'd even go far and say even 19 year olds are pure undiluted cringe and you have to be mentally deficient to find any intellectual or emotional stimulation from interacting with them. >>24864083>You know what me and the girls and a boy did at summer camp?>It means she consented. He drugged LolitaWhen she woke up, she asked if he knew what she and Charlie did, and if he did the same in childhood. It sounds rather innocuous, like a child asking if you know what is in his hand.Humbert concluded that meant Lolita was experienced and ready for sex. The scene is pedophilic to the max and shows how pedophiles abuse the slightest tinges of sexuality in kids in order to justify their molestation and rape. "Oh, she said she touches herself down there; it means RAPE TIME."Along with Finneegans Wake, Lolita is the litmus test for autism, because you have to understand people and their behaviour instead of mere words to see how fucked up and predatory Humbert Humbert is. With Lolita, the secret is in the details outside the first person narration, but it requires not being an autist to see it. Everyone who thinks Lolita consented or initiated or seduced Humbert is an autist who takes the obvious narrative at surface value.>>24864068>>24864081You don't need to have an English degree to see that Lolita's actions don't agree with how Humbert interprets the events.If you support Humbert you don't know how to read and take the book at surface level. You can't spot nuance and dissonance. That's the game Nabokov plays with his readers. He presents one version of the story while giving hints, through the behaviour of characters outside the main narrator, about another version of the same story. It's clear as day to everyone who has read the book and has average intelligence. No need to even introduce concepts as unreliable narrator.Anyone who takes Lolita at surface level is either autistic or retarded.
>>24864110Sip your corn syrup and chill out mutt. Humbert is Aryan.
>>24864110Autism is very useful for Finnegans Wake though
