Is Heideggers thought the solution for philosophizing in a modern world?I’m reading an introduction on Heidegger and being and time right now and I’m getting the feeling that this approach is becoming evermore relevant.
the OG whiny and impotent postmodernist
>>24880241How is Heidegger a postmodernist?
>>24880248idk ask Deleuze
>>24880252No you tell me lazy accuser
>>24880241You mean Nietzsche?
should I start hiding eggers myself?
>>24880110No
>>24880110I dont think Heidegger has any any arguments sentiments worth studying after having made the mistake...of studying them. Stick to real philosophersOr real nazis evenDont just smurf word your way to "being and Daseinfeld"Take your thrownnness into an actual acceptable explanation of anything
>>24880252>>24880266Alright you 2, we violated the first rule of postmodernism. You know what that means, it's always been and always will be and currently is. 2 different beings in 2 different worlds.>>24880479Don't know how to use a hammer, just pick it up and go with it.
>>24880110He's okay. He just took a lot of his material from Husserl and inverted it
I wish I knew what the fuck was philosophy about. The dumbo conspiracy part of my brain thinks it's just rich men being bored and playing with their brain
>>24880989I am not really in to Heidegger but he supposedly revolutionalized the way people look at Parmenides or something.
>>24880555Really? Nothing about being-in-the-world or Dasein or the technology critique seems worthy of studying to you?
