Do I really have to go to Kant after this pure kino?
>>24882537fucking kino
I don’t get Leibniz at all, he seems pretty silly after Kant. His monadology is a proto-idealism but mixed up with lots of nonsense (the impossibility of infinite division, God as a deus ex machina). I dunno man I might be a pseud but never understood the appeal. Someone Redpill me.
>>24882537What the fuck is this cover?
>>24883266Just an anamorphic lil guy in his monad