[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: index-1666029047.jpg (173 KB, 1004x1000)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>Read LOTR
>nothing else comes close

Sigh
>>
Why is this series being shilled on here lately? I'm about to finish book 3 and there are huge chunks of the books that are just poor. Poorly written, poorly conceived, poorly executed. This should have faded to obscurity within 2 decades. I often think it's a world people like thinking about, dissecting and supposing, instead of actually engaging with the works themselves
>>
>>24882942
asctually russian version is superior
look it up
>>
>>24882957
>lately
wtf you talking about nigg? its the go too entry level shill fantasy book cause everyone has heard of it. I do somewhat agree that its not all that amazing, though entertaining enough.
>>24882942
In what way? I feel like Howards's Conan stories are more raw, Vances dying earth is more wonderous, and the moral subject of Ivanhoe are more thought provoking.

DESU I think Tolkien's Silmarillion is much more impressive and unique of a work, since it attempts to create a full mythical canon in the veins of an elder/yonger edda or Bible instead of a traditional singular narritive.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.