>>24885076
That book was arguably his best offering, some of the dilemmas he presented can still be used on older material.

>>24885443
Definitely agree.

>>24886311
It doesn't stop him from inhaling his own farts though. My favorite was Marx's dilemma, for anyone looking to rehabilitate Marx they can't ignore the unfolding that's happened since. This is kind of like saying all of the remediation efforts out there across the world don't require an understanding of Marx to use. Given this then the rehabilitation effort can lead to 2 outcomes, he made a really good point somewhere and just asked if Marx identified substance. Literally he did, and if you opt for this literal reading then Marx can turn into a bloodthirsty profiteer. He can show up on anyone's field and ruthlessly destroy his opposition since he doesn't need any agreements and can view subordination as obsolescence. He becomes the ultimate war machine and validates the original critiques. If you go with no to identifying substance then you enter murky water, you have to undergo the dialectical unfolding of previous no options. This one leaves you with 2 options if you should choose to continue. Another really good one was the materialist theology, Christians have an inherent advantage over other religions but most don't reach an actualization to take advantage of this.