[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 9780752889801.jpg (28 KB, 295x450)
28 KB
28 KB JPG
My mom was really insistent I read picrel growing up, now that I'm getting back into reading again, I decided to give it a try after finishing The Hobbit.
What's the general consensus on this book/series?
I've heard all kinds of bad things about it, but most of them have to throw in some hate for the author and his political ideology as well. They call him a Libertarian, Ayn Rand simp, Anti-communist, pro-hierarchy, and all that in the sort of way that presumes it's bad to be any of those things. Granted, I don't want to read a book just preaching political ideas, even the ones I agree with. (I don't know Ayn Rand's beliefs, and I don't call myself a Libertarian any more, just to be clear)
Is it just Redditors being mad that an author disagrees with them, or are these books actually that bad?

I'm at about 150 pages, and kind of struggling to find the will to go on. The writing is just wonky and awkward most of the time. Maybe I'm just too used to Tolkien and his masterful writing, but it's just offputting. It's written with the subject matter of an edgy smut fanfic, with the subtlety of a children's book.

Also, is there some sort of literature equivalent of the Three Episode Rule from Anime fandom? I'm just wondering how much it's expected I give books as a "Fair Chance" at it.
>>
>>24891395
>The writing is just wonky and awkward most of the time. Maybe I'm just too used to Tolkien and his masterful writing, but it's just offputting. It's written with the subject matter of an edgy smut fanfic, with the subtlety of a children's book.
You basically just summarized it all, but the villain is kind of cool and I remember liking the concluding sections which made the first third checkpoint worth getting through.
>>
>>24891395
It's not great, but still memorable, at least the first couple books.

>Is it just Redditors being mad that an author disagrees with them
Yes, Reddit hates Goodkind with passion. I do believe it's mostly because of politics. While Sword of Truth isn't particularly good, it's definitely not the worst thing ever.

>Also, is there some sort of literature equivalent of the Three Episode Rule from Anime fandom? I'm just wondering how much it's expected I give books as a "Fair Chance" at it.
Personally, I always try to finish the first book in the series. If it's not good enough, I drop it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.