>There's people here who needed to read atheist books to get to the logical conclusion that God isn't real
they read them so they can argue with christians without sounding as retarded as they actually are
>>24903065And I still don't know if god is real or not.
>>24903067what is there to argue with Christians>erm the world is going to end plus everyone i dislike is going to hell because i said sookay, cool, thanks for letting me know.
>>24903065>>24903067>the logical conclusionIf you are an atheist, then you need to logically argue about either an infinite regression or about spontaneous generation Good luck with that
>>24903161>then you need to logically argue about either an infinite regression or about spontaneous generationWhy would you need to do that? They're not the ones saying those questions have an empirically known and verifiable answer at this point in time.
>>24903161>Atheists have to give (correct) answers to questions my Religion gives false answers to. Good luck with that.
>>24903065There's the rub. Belief in God doesn't come through reason, but faith. If someone believes in God, then they aren't considering, or have temporarily ceased to consider, rational explanations. I know plenty of anons here intentionally suspend their disbelief as if religion is just fantasy. To own the libs? I don't know. You don't have to offload your critical sense just to defy the times.
>>24903165Metaphysics have been philosophically and logically debated since ancient history. Here's a simple question: Did the universe have a beginning or is it eternal (without beginning nor end)? >>24903168>Atheists have to give (correct) answers to questions my ReligionAgain, metaphysics have been logically and philosophically debated since ancient times when christianity did not exist. We are not talking about religion, we are talking about God.
>>24903170>Here's a simple question: Did the universe have a beginning or is it eternal (without beginning nor end)?Kant's antinomies solved this hundreds of years ago.
>>24903170>Again, metaphysics have been logically and philosophically debated since ancient times when christianity did not exist. We are not talking about religion, we are talking about God.No one mentioned Christianity but you. And if we are talking about "God" we are talking about "religion," you're being a sophist. If you wanted to be a less sophistical pedant you could just say "metaphysics." Metaphysics has been debated since ancient times, and it has all been wrong. We who reject metaphysics don't have to provide answers to make up for the nonsense that metaphysicians spout.
>>24903173>yea bro this guy solved metaphysics He believe in God. >>24903178>No one mentioned Christianity but you.Can you be more pedantic? No, you can't. You where the one to mention religion, not me. Not only that but you mentioned religion as a singular, not a plural. Of course, the most popular religion in the world is christianity. Yet the discussion of God's existence is metaphysical, not religious. Religion is what follows, not what precedes it. Here is my comment fixed, for pedantic assholes like you: Again, metaphysics have been logically and philosophically debated since ancient times when Christianity, or Islam, or Hinduism, or Buddhism, or Sikhism, or Judaism, or Bahá’í Faith, or Jainism, or Shinto, or Confucianism, or Taoism, or Zoroastrianism, or Cao Dai, or Tenrikyo, or Rastafarianism, or Yoruba religion, or Candomblé, or Umbanda, or Santería, or Vodou, or Druze, or Yazidism, or Mandaeism, or Alevi belief, or Eckankar, or Falun Gong, or Unitarian Universalism, or Neo-Paganism, or Wicca, or Daejonggyo, or Cheondoism, or Native American traditional religions, or Australian Aboriginal traditional religions, or African traditional religions (various), or Chinese folk religion, or Korean shamanism, or New Age movements, or Scientology did not exist. We are not talking about religion, we are talking about God.
>>24903065Eh?Why do you believe God isn't real?
>>24903178> We who reject metaphysics don't have to provide answers to make up for the nonsense that metaphysicians spout.>Fundamental questions and dialectics concerning nature, existence, and being is nonsenseYou may not realize it, but your speak from the same abominable taproot of modernity that trans kids, mass shooters, trans mass shooters, and totalitarian death camps all spring from. Please reconsider your anti-intellectualism and read Voegelin.
I had to read holy books to get to the conclusion that god is real but not what I thought god was supposed to be.
why come only white people invented philosophy to disprove god?is religion fundamentally brown coded?
>>24903259Brain rot.
>>24903065Can we ever have debates in good faith?
>>24903152Wow spot on and not disingenuous strawmanning!You're doing so good in rebuttaling the notion that atheists are edgy 15 yr olds!
>>24903277No.
