>>24918152
I don't know but you're definitely the gayest and brownest OP to ever live.

File: hq.jpg (38 KB, 686x386)

38 KB JPG

He would contemplate in the clock.
If he could not make a return, he would press the button

>>24918152
>wants to turn the whole world into a breeding ground for higher types
>imagines annihilation on a grander scale than nazis did
at least when it comes to philosophers, he is definitely the most evil one

>>24918152
There are many who were worse.
He was just someone who had a lot of resentment and that led to a sad kind of philosophy. He would be the emo kid in the 00s.

Maybe his friends should have found him a good wife and that would have fixed his life.

>>24918152
No, in terms of philosophers nobody did more damage than Francis Bacon, a Machiavellian who unleashed an abominable technological machine upon the planet.

>>24918152
No he just described himself as such in his books to provoke people.

File: 1664421198970685.png (217 KB, 500x375)

217 KB PNG

stop watching emotionally manipulative children's cartoons

>>24918152
the most evil to ever live was karl popper, with the runner up being william wilberforce

>>24919029
>karl popper
solid choice. i still might pick herbert spencer or auguste comte

>>24918152
He was Beyond Good and Evil™.

yeah he killed god

>>24919025
Pic is from that Happy Science cult indoctrination anime iirc. That really is supposed to be Nietzsche, he is a supersemon from hell there.

I’ve tried to read him but it’s all artsy dicking around and emotional grandstanding. I like my philosophy rational and autistic. And if I want to read someone “like that” Kierkegaard is better in every way.

>>24919241
>rational and autistic
so just read analytic philosophers, retard. fichte, leibniz, quine, early rorty, some wittgenstein, etc
>kierkegaard
yeah youre too retarded to know what the word rational really means

>>24918152
No, that was Hegel.

>>24918152
he's a nice/soft/sentimental guy who feels really bad about stuff why does anyone think he's evil

>>24918152
No, that would be Marx.

>>24919241
>doesn't read the guy who defeated the blind assumptions of rationalism that had been plaguing European thought since Plato because he isn't rational

>>24918569
It's crazy how fucking dorky that whole era was, from Nietzsche to the Nazis, and they didn't even have videogames, yet they were the cringiest dorks you will ever find

>>24918152
Hell no.
Paul was!