[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gigachad2.jpg (84 KB, 1440x1766)
84 KB
84 KB JPG
I do judge a book by its cover.
>>
Me too, that’s how I picked goosebumps books
>>
I refused to read In Watermelon Sugar because I hate the title.
>>
>>24924495
Same, unless the author is dead, but I can't trust someones artistic sense or taste if they picked an ugly cover.
>>
>>24924521
same, I also hate he author's photo
>>
>>24924555
I have never seen an author's photo that doesn't come off as a complete douchebag.
>>
I only buy books with movie adapted covers
>>
File: 1640032984120.jpg (237 KB, 853x1000)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
>>24924495
Cringe. I judge books by their titles.
>>
>>24924521
Good, you dodged a bullet. In Watermelon Sugar gave me deeply unsettled vibes.
>>
>>24924788
You should see my collection of vintage movie tie in covers I've accumulated through thrifting over the years. I'd share some examples but I dont want the bedwetters to jump on the fad and ruin it
>>
>recent indie book on amazon
>uses the most obviously AI-generated art for its cover
>somehow is not filled to the brim with LLM-generated text but an actual writer's work
a disturbing trend



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.