[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 88248344.png (50 KB, 300x300)
50 KB
50 KB PNG
>had had
>>
>should of
>>
>>24926346
Grammatically correct pluperfect of "have" btw
>>
File: mfw.gif (2.97 MB, 498x280)
2.97 MB
2.97 MB GIF
>>24926346
>that that
>>
>>24926346
>it’s X is its
>>
>>24926346
I swear I managed to get 'if if' once but can't remember exactly how
>>
File: IMG_3376.png (416 KB, 1320x2868)
416 KB
416 KB PNG
>>24926590
I just inadvertently used if if if
>>
>>24926580
"depends on what the word is is"
>>
File: IMG_3377.jpg (355 KB, 1320x1628)
355 KB
355 KB JPG
>>24926616
And the answer
>>
>>24926616
you use grok to write your anonymous 4chan posts that wont be here tomorrow
>>
>>24926626
From is a better friend than 9/10 4chan posters
>>
>>24926635
Grok*
>>
File: 1685640601669131.jpg (68 KB, 407x530)
68 KB
68 KB JPG
>>24926622
>>
ok, but what if Kant is the least popular philosopher and you're hooked into some kind of niche fandom cult?
>>
Joe, while Kelly had had,had had had had, had had had been the correct answer to the teacher's test.
>>
>>24926590
conditional clauses can be written in order of either cause -> effect or effect -> cause. The word "if" can be placed before the cause in these cases. "If" can also used to show possible results of an event, in this case it is interchangeable with whether in common vernacular.

Note how the following sentences are all equivalent and are more or less grammatically correct although some of them are more clunky than the others:

>I wrote it to see if, if we explain our logic clearly, we can come to an agreement

>I wrote it to see if we can come to an agreement if we explain our logic clearly

>I wrote it to see whether we can come to an agreement if we explain our logic clearly

>I wrote it to see whether, if we explain our logic clearly, we can come to an agreement
>>
>>24926704
Kant cant can't cant Kant cant
>>
>>24926553
wtf is a plupperfect
>>
>>24926346
This is grammatically correct
>>24926488
This is not
>>24926568
This is stylistically fine
>>24926580
This is just grammatically incorrect
>>24926590
"if 'if' is the word you're thinking of [...]" or something like that would make it grammatically fine
>>
>>24926756
can't canned Kant cunt cant Kant's cunt's cant?
>>
>>24926622
so forced
"Theyre trying to figure out whether or not the match will be cancelled if it rains"
>>
>>24926774
>>
>>24926590
could use nested conditionals
>modus ponens states that if if A then B is true and A is true then B is true



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.