i feel like i've hit a wall in my philosophical investigations... i feel that my philosophical intuition is developed enough to get the gist of things, and that any further study is essentially pointless or overly pedantic. art seems like the best expositor of the world's true nature since it's an act of spirit or idea and the world is really at bottom about spirit or idea however you want to pattern it. conversely the nature of things like fact and individualized experience are basically as static points in a grid and axioms only exist for reasons pertaining to internal consistency. the only way to actually know things is to study phenomena which one can do perfectly without any sort of formalized description or training in the repertoire of philosophical schools of thought since these things only contribute an irksome technical familiarity anyway. i don't see any point to looking at philosophy or taking it seriously in that capacity except for purely practical career or academic reasons for those involved to such an extent in the field which i am not.
>>24927228Ok fag
