I was reading the second volume today when I stumbled upon this passage:>And here appears the absolute necessity that all capital be either fixed or circulating somewhat like the natural necessity that a mammal be male or female.https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1885-c2/ch10.htmthis seems concerning
>>24928400a better question would be whether reading the "or" as implying a sexuated continuum in both terms of the analogy disrupts the overall scheme of capital
>>24928400Troonsisters...do we subscribe to Keynesian economic theory now?
>>24928400Gender, like Marxism, is a spectrum.
>>24928400I think it says something about the hazards of applying natural biology to the laws of economics or political philosophy.
>>24928445>my penis is mostly female
>>24928400>did you just ASSUME my GENDER?
>>24928400Just wait till your realize Capital has reached the stage of accumulation and development that the very biological basis of sex and it’s identity is being commodified through sex changes, hormone therapy, and the cornucopia of money making grifting to be made off of the manufactured tranny hysteria going on currently. Trannies are pure grade capitalist Frankenstein Guinea pigs.
>>24928514>mfw you get instant banned on lefty/pol/ for pointing this out>mfw I have no face
>>24928514I think transhumanism is cool
>>24928565Transhumanism is just people thinking they're smarter than evolution. They're wrong.
>>24928565I'm hesitant
>>24928572third thesis on feuerbach
>>24928565Transhumanism is a misnomer disguising posthumanism which is entirely anti-human and threatens a total war, genocidal friend-enemy distinction.
Marx was wrong about SOME things.
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/522960512