[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Is he right that satanism is merely a trick or is the satanic a proper ontological category? Seeing the child murdering elites it seems the Abrahamic religions were onto something.
>>
>>24929922
Why don't more illuminati pose like this? It's more obscured in profile.
>>
Nietzsche saw satanism as a valid metaphysical category, it's just that he saw all metaphysics as a trick of the light, not light itself.
>>
File: mm2.png (141 KB, 248x291)
141 KB
141 KB PNG
>>24929922
You know who else murdered children?
>>
>>24929922
in what book does he say that



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.