[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


In Western esotericism there appears to be a recurring metaphysical divide between immanent, soul-oriented vitalism (Becoming) and transcendent, spirit-oriented Platonism (Being).

1. Soul-oriented / immanence-leaning thinkers (e.g., Ludwig Klages, John Lash, Michael Tsarion) emphasize life, psyche, myth, and a living, ensouled cosmos. They frequently draw on Sophianic myths, Dionysian mystery currents, Druidic and chthonic symbolism, and tend to treat the sacred as something embedded within Becoming and the Earth itself.

2. Spirit-oriented / transcendence-leaning thinkers (e.g., Rene Guenon, Julius Evola, Nimrod de Rosario) emphasize a supra-cosmic Principle identified with immutable, Parmenidean Being, treating Becoming as ultimately illusory or derivative. They typically read Norse and Hyperborean symbolism as encoding a polar, pre-cosmic tradition of uncompromised transcendence before material or psychic descent.

While these camps sometimes borrow similar myths and symbols, they diverge sharply on whether ultimate reality is to be re-entered through immanent life and soul or escaped through transcendent Spirit and metaphysical ascent.
>>
yeah, there are basically two types of perennialism's, the right wing trad evola revolt against the modern world kind, or the psychedelic new age doors of perception Aldous Huxley kind
>>
Your point?
>>
>>24930090
Just a replay of Plato/Aristotle, Apollo/Dionysus, etc.

Protip: go with Plato
>>
>>24930100
Spirit-oriented is the right path. Soul-oriented is for fags and pussies.
>>
>>24930124
Spirit oriented is for life deniers and (spiritual) jews
>>
>>24930099
I presume Jung is the middle way?
>>
Dion Fortune made a similar distincion between "magus" and "mystic".
>The mystic, in the classical Christian sense, is one who strips away all the elements of this world in order to free that spark of the divine within us to fIy upwards to its natural place with the divine. The magus fulfills the same task by embedding themselves into this world and by calling the divine down to their own level.

but i agree with this anon
>>24930109
esotericists steal all their material from real philosophers, but are usually worse writers and add some of that "revealed to me in a dream, i can show you how, but only in cryptic allegories" as OC.
>>
>>24930169
how to become magus?
>>
>>24930217
Giordano Bruno - Magusmaxxing for Dummies
>>
>>24930217
initiation into hermetics - franz bardon



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.