/lit/ - >order copy on the left as sure it's 2000s dull, b - Literature

Anonymous

12/08/25(Mon)19:20:47 No.24935661

File: imgonline-com-ua-twotoone(...).jpg (1.93 MB, 3354x2561)

Anonymous 12/08/25(Mon)19:20:47 No.24935661 Archived

>order copy on the left as sure it's 2000s dull, but apparently the 50th anniversary print has typos
>copy on the right shows up in the post

Fuckin NEAT

Anonymous
12/08/25(Mon)19:22:27 No.24935665

Anonymous 12/08/25(Mon)19:22:27 No.24935665

love those old 80's Dune covers. idk why book covers basically all suck nowadays.

Anonymous
12/08/25(Mon)19:27:08 No.24935672

Anonymous 12/08/25(Mon)19:27:08 No.24935672

File: dont mind if i dune.jpg (177 KB, 900x669)

177 KB JPG

why do they insist on making such ugly ass covers these last like 20-30 years? i bet i could go on pinterest and find a better image to use as a cover than whatever that abomination is on the left after like 2 minutes of perusing.

Anonymous
12/08/25(Mon)19:28:39 No.24935677

Anonymous 12/08/25(Mon)19:28:39 No.24935677

File: 1722801547511670 (2)~2.jpg (1.95 MB, 3675x2853)

1.95 MB JPG

>>24935665
True anon. My sequels are mix of various classic styles, I got them for pennies at the market. I already have a copy of Dune with the twin moon cover used here on Children from around the time of the Lynch film, but my friend has borrowed it for about two years at this point. I was going to gift him the boring cover version but it seems I will need to get him a different small gift now lel

Anonymous
12/08/25(Mon)19:30:28 No.24935682

Anonymous 12/08/25(Mon)19:30:28 No.24935682

>>24935677
very nice

Anonymous
12/09/25(Tue)10:16:53 No.24937144

Anonymous 12/09/25(Tue)10:16:53 No.24937144

>>24935677
sick

Anonymous
12/09/25(Tue)11:12:50 No.24937229

Anonymous 12/09/25(Tue)11:12:50 No.24937229

>>24935672
they show up better on amazon thumbnails