you are understanding and retain what you read aren't you? you aren't just speeding through your books just so you can say you "read" them in order to add them to a public tally, right?
I remember a thread probably over a decade ago by now where a bunch of anons were saying they never read books twice because the "first impression is best impression" or some claptrap argument that ran like that. The board is full of plebs who simply don't even like literature.
>>24937172I've been working through the same book for the past three fucking years. I'm only 3/4 of the way through. I bet you can't guess what book it is.
>>24937358Harry potter
>>24937363You have no idea how close you are, friend
>>24937358corpus hermeticum
>>24937172i don't have a goodreads account mr bloom, im not one of those pick-me vermins, i swear.
>>24937182the entire site is brimming with shit postersmost 4chan posters now think that was always the point of 4chan, the be all and end all.
>>24937172I always make sure I understand what I've read fully and am very selective about which books I spend time studying. It's for this reason that I wasn't able to finish Gravity's Rainbow, it was simply too dense to wrap my head around at the time and I moved on. Looking forward to giving it another go in earnest.
