Has the 'id, ego and superego' ever been disproven?
>>24939250you can't really prove nor disprove an internal model of the psyche
>>24939250check out candace owens on freud
>>24939279>Powder that makes you listen to Candace Owens
>>24939250freud is midwit bait for gaytheists and Christ-killers. the first actual psychology discovery was iq. since then neuroscience has discovered basic anatomy of a neuron and identified many nuclei in the cns. the tripartitie mind and the passive intellect of aristotle and aquinas are less talked about than the thalamus hippocampus neocortex today
>>24939250In a sense.You can prove that crowd/herd psychology plays a much more significant role than Freud realized or accounted for when he started.He's far too individualistic for it to be an accurate description of a (fundamentally) social animal.After being challenged on the subject, rather than putting up a defense he acknowledged the oversight and wrote a short book, but it was too late in his career to rework everything.His nephew Bernays did pretty impactful practical work thoughever. When you see a glowie psyop in motion, that's the result of his work.
>>24939250No, but then again it was never technically proven in the first place. It’s a rigid and outdated model now that modern psychology is bootstrapped by neuroscience. For example, our improved understanding of what is rightly the domain of mind has eaten away at the notion of the Id, since many of those unconscious drives are arguably not so much neurological processes as excitations of the CNS. Basically, if you think that the Id is accurate, you have to start asking if a spine can think.
>>24939317True and real.I too am a Le Bon enjoyer.
>>24939531Only the neocortex can think. But the spinal plexus is part of the peripheral nervous system, and indivisible from the brain.
>>24939272First post only good post
the topological model has hardly even been understood
>>24939549Me three! Read him two years ago, both of his main works
