[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1751743063614187.jpg (159 KB, 704x1000)
159 KB
159 KB JPG
Is this actually worth reading? I understand that it's supposed to be immensely influential to the novel as a form. I have a lot of time on my hands right now. Should I bother?
>>
>>24944205
No. If you absolutely have to read something from this general period, go for Fanny Burney.
>>
>>24944205
It's not worthless but it's not worth slogging through if you hate it. Try it and see. The hardest bit to swallow is how mean Clarissa's family are to her for more-or-less no reason.

>>24944238
>Fanny Burney.
You can do without FB because Jane Austen does everything she does better.
>>
File: Meg_Griffin.png (55 KB, 229x340)
55 KB
55 KB PNG
>>24944248
>The hardest bit to swallow is how mean Clarissa's family are to her for more-or-less no reason



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.