is the field of semiotics captured or no?
If you are even moderately intelligent you should know there is no refuge from terror in our age.
>>24945280I'm sure of that but no need to be a pissant. Anyways, whats some good works on semiotics that might be of interest to a non-progressive like myself?
>>24945307You're already coming at it from the wrong angle
>>24945280>in our age.hate this phrase. Things have always been the same.
>>24945399oh no, I'm totally aware signs must be taken as is from multiple angles, historical, allegorical, etc but I'd rather not a semiotic that attempts to eek out homosexuality from the pages of authors like Sir Walter Scott, to use an example or how certain colors can be interpreted as racist.
>>24945280Based fpbp
>>24945307>hey y'all, anyone got some fucking based semiotics?
>>24945307What a stupid statement. Polemics have nothing to do with semiotics.