[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


Everything else just seems so spooked and retarded. Like these "philosophers" can't even see past their own circumstances or analyze their own thoughts and motivations, only (poorly) justify their own particular neuroses. Has there ever been a half decent attempt at addressing, let alone refuting him?
>>
>>24947731
read his successor, Ben Klassen.
>>
File: frog.jpg (54 KB, 976x850)
54 KB
54 KB JPG
>>24947737
>>
>>24947731
>Has there ever been a half decent attempt at addressing, let alone refuting him?
His philosophy boils down to "do what pleases you, including acting like a normal human being", what's there to refute? It's like saying that dogs bark or cats meow.
>>
>>24947731
>Has there ever been a half decent attempt at addressing, let alone refuting him?
That's what several hundred pages of Marx and Engels' "The German Ideology" is dedicated towards. Whether it was successful is up to you.
>>
his philosophy isnt very deep, its like stoicism in its applicability
>>
File: bery angury.jpg (44 KB, 319x310)
44 KB
44 KB JPG
>>24947740
>>
>>24947750
>what's there to refute?
Everything? Pretty much all philosophical systems describe or prescribe actions that conflict with this principle. You cannot accept egoism while also genuinely believing in philosophy. Obviously, then, these philosophers reject the idea. Why?
>>
>>24947773
Because the ego itself is a spook. Read Metzinger.
>>
>>24947731
>How do I enjoy philosophy after Stirner?
Take what you find useful as your property and disreguard the rest.
>>
>>24947731
its slave moralism + a bit of nihilism. ignoring the reality of the world and power is only appeaing if youre depressed and/or going through an existential crisis (same thing really and you probably just need more vitamin d)
>>
>>24948041
wrong thread
>>
never met a Stirnerite that's been able to actually put his beliefs into his practice to not be a broke gay loser
>>
>>24948045
no just connect the dots from solipsistic denial of reality
>>
>>24948046
>you must prioritize acquiring money
spooked
>>
>>24948046
then you obviously haven't heard of Ben Klassen.
>>
>>24948046
All billionaires are egoist
>>
>>24947750
So, Taoism?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.