Are similar, on the one hand, analytical error or synthesis and on the other, the error between the conclusions of a pair of reasonings that contain equivocity, or especially, that contain a false univocity. The fragmentation of reality into several particular “possible worlds” linked to each other from the outside, under the pretense of universality, is like starting from a whole and its parts, then enlarging the whole to contain itself when a part exceeds it, whereas the whole disintegrates at every moment when it is no longer itself. Aesthetically, what is lost is everything that is not the represented formalization. Ethically, it is aesthetics and in metaphysics, everything is lost.Possessing an absolute Spirit would allow analytical truth. But for us, the seduction of the analytic will remain similar to that of the religious, the latter still being the more desirable. — Even if one admits mathematics a priori, concepts need a posteriori object in order to be true - objects that are contingent to the point of being absolutely fortuitous - for is indeterminate what is possible false. Analytics have lost on their own ground.
bump
Sounds like skill issue
>>24954265Yes, anyone who has studied the Greeks and the idealists can see through the analytics like they’re made of glass. You hit the nail on the head in the second paragraph. External reflection. Some of them proudly align themselves with Protagoras. Like the animulculae in Lucretius it makes you laugh until you weep. It’s not an academic game either, the content of this mode of philosophizing is the world we live in, what Fichte called sarcastically the age of common sense.
>>24954265You would have received more replies with better writing.
