>God does not exist.Behold, the power of Cathlodox theology!
>>24961246>if God doesn’t exist like a physical object does then He doesnt exist at allYour brain on atheist/prostestant logic
>>24961246This looks like a pack of cigarettes
>>24961246Dumbarton Oaks is a nice gated park in DC, not sure how its name got attached to that book
>>24961246
>>24961400Check out the Dunbarton Medieval Library collection. Some fantastic books of middle ages
>>24961416It is worth it if I only speak and read English?
>>24961424Lotta Latin and Byzantine stuff. Idk if you into that. But they're all translated w good notes. I have a couple church fathers and doctors through them. Also the books on anglo latin riddle tradition are quite fun
>evil is just nothingness >God is nothingUh, a = b and b = c a = c... this is why you don't read philosophy before Frege.
>>24961582>filtered
>>24961595No, I know exactly what I'm talking about. "Muh distinctions" and "muh analogical predication" is just a way to handwaved so as to make mystical woo woo seem logical, a tool of fanatics who cannot into modern formal logic. They can scream about "muh potentiality is intensional" all they want, S5 proves that God leads to modal collapse. "Muh nominalism," is not a response to this. Nominalism is just what you get when you realize logic isn't based on some magical spirit realm.
>>24961286It’s not that he doesn’t exist as a physical object it is that he is not a substance period. Aquinas says the same thing.
>>24961647>t.damned to eternal hellfire
>>24961246Not an actual quote. Very oftenly misquoted author. Not for the plebs.
>>24961698>It’s not that he doesn’t exist as a physical object it is that he is not a substance period. Aquinas says the same thing.He is not a substance in the sense of being a placeholder for attributes but is in the Cartesian definition of substance as completely self-sufficient existence.
