>we'll study grammar in secret societies>we'll remove grammar from schools for the masses>we'll present "intellectuals" in the media that tell them grammar is fake and useless
>don't know there/their/they're>how could the jews do this to me
>>24962408They removed logic from the masses too, which your post is a good example of.https://youtu.be/U3Jm8zF7bJ8?&t=2857
>>24962396Does anyone want to pinpoint a year when American education was subverted, and the year of births negatively impacted by those changes?I graduated in 2014; I did not notice any downgrade.
>>24962474It began when the Prussian education system was implemented throughout the West in the 19th century. The dumbing down of the masses has been a gradual process since then. Euclid was abolished in the 1950s.https://redice.tv/news/the-origins-of-the-american-public-education-system-horace-mann-and-the-prussian-model-of-obedience
>>24962503>Euclid was abolished in the 1950s.What is wrong with it? You could always write a better and more relevant geometry textbook.
>>24962538No. They didn't all of a sudden write a better book than the book that had been used for millennia. It was abolished to dumb down the masses.https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-jan-30-oe-crease30-story.html
>>24962503Wilhelm von Humboldt FTW
>>24962474whenever they started these programs against teenage pregnancy, i have met adult women in their 30s who still talk about pregnancy like it's some horrible thing that man "does" to you, the message that young women clearly received wasn't "don't get pregnant at 16" it was "don't get pregnant ever". i bet if u look at one that shit started in schools birthrates dropped.
>>24962503Euclid is fun but not representative of how people think about mathematics today. Read him to understand how phil of math changed over time.
>>24962474Mandatory public education is itself a subversion.
>>24962396There's plenty of legitimate reason to criticize Chomsky, you don't need to make shit up.
>>24963329
>>24963333I can't think of one legitimate criticism of Chomsky, literally everything he did was based
>>24962474Definitely by the 50s. Remember, the boomers and their children have aborted 30 million white children.
>>24963313Why do women believe dumb shit?
get in the pod
>>24962503Link has no relevance to the claim that Euclid was "abolished" in the 1950s.>>24962739Link has no relevance to the claim that Euclid was abolished to dumb down the massesI can see why you're obsessed with the trivium, when your brain is so malformed and belching all the time that you can't sensibly connect relevant links to your claims. Being dependent on YT vids instead of reading a book the whole way through is another sign.
>>24963595Not that anon. Here's one of the reasons Euclid became a thing of the past for american schools>The School Mathematics Geometry Study Group" (SMSG) refers to the landmark 1950s-70s U.S. initiative, driven by the Sputnik launch, to modernize math education, creating curricula like New Math, focusing on understanding, axiomatic systems (like SMSG's Euclidean geometry)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_Mathematics_Study_Grouphttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_MathBut the Elements was already falling out of favor in the 19th century. Lewis Carrol wrote a defense: Euclid and His Modern Rivals (1879).
Manufacturing Consent was one of the greatest and most popular red pills of all time however.
>>24963327What if we like changed it back so that today's math is like no longer relevant and people just read about to understand what changed you fucking buffoon
>>24963368The Critical Period For Language Learning was a sham. Scientistic mysticism, mostly for midwittery cope.
>>24962503Its absolutely criminal how children are no longer taught to use a compass and straightedge to prove through bisection of a triangle the angle A is equivalent to the angle B. Instead they are taught a bunch of irrelevant gobblygook "calculus" developed by literal occultist weirdos like Newton.
>>24962396>posting the blood meridian of popular intellectuals
>>24964569Lmao thats a good one anon
>>24964559more like manufacturing the age of consent lmao. never have i seen such a fall from grace like that of chomsky.
>>24962456Dangling participle leading to syntactical ambiguity
mmmmmmmmmmmvotebiden
>we'll talk about politics>but just about the façade of it, never the inside,>just the body of the car, never the engine under the bonnet,>always the evil whitey, never the jew.
>>24964907No there isn't. But anyway, you're totally confused. You're the one that came in here, and didn't know to separate an idea from the person, and thought that all discussion is about is attacking the person. If you had studied any logic at all you wouldn't be like this. The topic of this thread is not me.
>>24965104So? This thread isn't about Noam Chomsky.
>>24963327>Euclid is fun but not representative of how people think about mathematics today.It is more likely that people today are simply mistaken about mathematics. Being taught geometry with the Cartesian coordinates first is a mistake.
>>24962456>Shits on Aquinas>Bends over for Ayn Rand>Says a mystic is someone who believes something based on feeling Way to torpedo any credibility you might have had
>>24965278You didn't click the link. It's timestamped to where it talks about the psychologization subcategory of ad hominem, which is what the person I replied to was doing, and which you are doing now. When you enter a discussion you're supposed to look at the ideas presented and address those, not instantly begin attacking the person. So many people are utterly confused today.
>>24962396>>24962408>>24962456Based. Education is a complete waste of time and money.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsdQeAGakL0
>>24963431They're not very smart
>>24965292Im not the anon you posted that at and I’m not attacking the character of the person. I’m placing scrutiny on Peikoff’s (the video’s) credibility. You sent a video and I checked it out. If someone’s an Randian objectivist, they can’t ground epistemological norms like fallacies in anything but brute enforcement, which means they can’t tell you why exactly these must be followed, only that their reasoning ends in an arbitrary stopping point. Furthermore, they misuse terms like “mystic” pejoratively and unwittingly make caricatures of opposing views, thereby committing fallacies. It’s at 2:15:20.
>pretends to be a justice fighter against the rich elites>goes to epstein islandwhat did he mean by this
>>24965431I don't give a fuck about Ayn Rand. I posted it for you to watch a few minutes from the timestamp. What he says there is what any logic book will tell you and has fuckall to do with Ayn Rand.
