One has. I'm reading Capital, volume 2 and I got to Chapter 20. I got a little bit into it and I almost started crying being frustrated with not being able to understand it. Yes, two departments, that's clear, but the exchanges between each of them seem to be written in a terrible way by Marx or I'm just retarded.https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1885-c2/ch20_01.htm#3
>>24965873Wanna-be intellectuals like Marx always word their drivel in ways that seem complex, but are really just intentionally obfuscating, hoping that later on down the line autists will come up with their own definitive interpretations of their rantings.
yeah, ch. 132 of moby-dick did
>>24965873Better capital coming through
>>24965873you're reading hegelbabble applied to economics, it's not meant to make sense
>>24965873>I (v+s) = II (c)
>>24965926I read it now and yeah that is the conclusion. So the money in advance was just used to trade these commodities and then remains as part of capitalist reserves after this happens? That is the tricky logic to me I suppose.
>>24965930>C' - M - C - P - C'>C' - m - c
>>24965873The memoir Night made me cry a lil.
Annihilation by Houellebecq. There's a scene where they are visiting the father inn an old age home and there's a performance for the oldies by a string quartet. The narrator goes outside into the carpark. It's dusk. The sounds of the strings hanging in the air. // I just thought it very poetic.Although I've got to say, my English translation had so many typos it was infuriating. At least 8 or 9.
>>24965873lol>>24966032lmao
