>If there were a contest for the most stupid idea in politics, my choice would be the assumption that people would be evenly or randomly distributed in incomes, institutions, occupations or awards, in the absence of somebody doing somebody wrong.Is ./ouruncle/ right?
>>24968719>awardsYeah he completely BTFO'd that strawman. "If it weren't for capitalism everyone would win the nobel prize" - Karl Marx. I'm not even a communist, but this level of dishonesty is embarassing for a supposed intellectual.
>>24968719Look at the monkey in his suit. He thinks he's people.
>>24968719Why do people not like him?
just world fallacy and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
>>24968719the fact that his name is unironically Thomas is incredibly funny.
>>24968719I dont really get it, but Thomas Sewell is one of the good ones, if you know what I mean.
>>24968739Every person doesn't need to have every award for awards to be "evenly distributed". He was clearly referring to the (real and common) belief that in the absence of bias each protected class would have the same proportion of awards as the entire population. You absolute retard.
>>24968764Why
>>24968794Uncle Tom, you illiterate /pol/ moron
>>24968719He's right and the idea goes back to Rousseau, for sure the most disastrous intellectual to ever put pen to paper.
>>24968756Bad take.
>>24968764Really, """incredibly""" funny? Moderate chuckle is all it does for me.
