It's the most beautiful love story I've ever read.
>>24975194>that coverNabokov would be rolling in his grave
>>24975196No not really. He only pretended it wasn't a love story to shield himself from criticism. This is the spirit the book was trying to convey. A young seductress meets her match in a perverted old man.
>>24975194It's not love, it's desire, and the idealistic, phantasmic veil the human imagination has the capacity to create and the harm we can cause to others as a result of it. But yes, it's a fantastic novel.
>>24975196nah, he was a child fucker... hid it obviously
>>24975194I've cried tears for Humbert, he only wanted the best for Lo. Lolita? she was a ungrateful bitch who jumped to Quilty the moment she could. One of most tragic one-sided love story I've ever read
Why are there so many pedos on /lit/?
>>24975300>Why is the highest IQ board filled with people who don't blindly subscribe to the unreasonably high age of consent laws forced upon them by second wave feminism?
>love storyhow is a board dedicated to literature filled with people with a complete inability to understand the bare essentials of any literature? this is not a love story. its about desire and it explicitly is about making it blindingly obvious that desire ≠ love.
>Perhaps, somewhere, some day, at a less miserable time, we may see each other again.This line always gets me
>>24975300Why are you a feminist cuck that respects contemporary age of consent laws? Anyone who reads literature written before 1980 can clearly see no one gave a shit before these past few decades. It makes sense people who read history and older literature would reject abbetative contemporary mores.
>>24975310>unreasonably high age of consent laws
>>24975203>>24975300>>24975355Why does this book always attract christcuck moralists. Like moths to a lamp.
>>24975355Nature gave all females an explicit biological indicator for when they are mature enough for sexual intercourse and reproduction. It's called mensturation.
>>24975355>when are female dogs mature enough to breedWhen they produce eggs and menstruate.>when are female cats mature enough to breedWhen they produce eggs and menstruation>when are female gorillas mature enough to breedWhen they produce eggs and menstruate >when are female homo sapiens mature enough to breed Buuuhhhh some shenanigans about brain development and emotional/financial stability
>>24975355>>24975368>>24975378>>24975385Remember that you will boil in liquid excrement for an infinite amount of years, childfuckers
>>24975310>blindly subscribeI can assure you I and every well-adjusted person I know has zero desire to fuck a 15 year old or especially younger>>24975331Restrictions on child labor, rejections of slavery, animal welfare laws are all recent phenomena as well. Who cares what half-savage societies did?
>>24975389Talmud reading jew trying to subvert normal male heterosexuality, as per usual.>>24975394Modern civilized man would never ever have sexual desires for a 15 year old girl, which is evil. But killing 5 million babies a year is A-OK.
>>24975200>>24975203He specifically requested the cover feature a butterfly and absolutely no girl.
>>24975200He never said it wasn't a love story if you actually watch interviews with him, ding dong. He said it's a love story about socially unacceptable love, like Anna Karenina.
>>24975300The number one truth about 4chan is that it's a pedo den.>/v/ talks about cunny>/tv/ talks about cunny>/lit/ talks about Lolita>/pol/ talks about pizzagate, Epstein, and age of consent>CP is spammed dailyLike, the whole place is pedophilic.>>24975310The second truth about 4chan is that it's generally of lower IQ than the rest of the Internet. The fact people unable to follow the rules of every other Internet platform congregate on 4chan speaks about the "intelligence" of the general user.Maybe some time in the past, /lit/ was high IQ, but the overall smear of conservative ideology across the board reeks of single digit intelligence.And pedophilia goes hand in hand with low IQ. And Nabokov is overrated. His books are the true epitome of pedophilia: glib appearance hiding ugliness within. Joyce was about patterns, linguistic, syntactic, structural, narrative ones. Nabokov was about fancy words, le what wacky literature reference comes next, and where's Waldo games with the readers. Nabokov is peak Reddit.
>>24975414>Maybe some time in the past, /lit/ was high IQ, but the overall smear of conservative ideology across the board reeks of single digit intelligenceI can tell you're a newfag because/lit/ is more leftist than it's ever been. 4chan is filled with contrarions so the blue boards were far more conservative during the Obama years. The last time they were this left leaning was W. Bush second term.
>>249754144chan isn't anymore pedophilic it's just unlike most online spaces it doesn't ban pedophilic discourse so it looks worse
>>24975435I don't know if this is true. There were periods of like 2-3 very vocal turds trying to shill Christian philosophers and stupid shit like that, but overall it's a herpy derpy liberal board that shoos people to /pol/.
>>24975443>it's just unlike most online spaces it doesn't ban pedophilic discourse so it looks worseIndeed, feminist age of consent laws are only upheld by jewish strangulation of free speech. Every platform that allows for free discourse will converge on the truth of nubile beauty.
>>24975414>>24975443>>24975394>>24975355>Pedophilia is when you are attracted to women who have gone through secondary sexual development
>>24975414This board is literally full of kikes trying to demoralize intelligent white men. I can only assume you are a Hebrew asset too, given the way you are speaking. You have my full contempt, Schlomo. Get ass raped by a nigger.
>>24975451>Jewish pedophile calling non-freaks zogbots
>>24975457>how dare you sexualize that 16 year old with D-cup breasts. Disgusting fucking pedophile.
>thread about pedophile book>jewish pedos swarm to thread to defend their pedophilia
>>24975389>>24975394Anon made a fair point. Why is "sexual maturity" determined by anything other than biology? If you arent using biology as your indicator, you ultimately just resort to feels-based nonsense. Likewise, any discussion on sexual maturity and age of consent that doesnt address the fact that the average age of menstruation for girls has lowered over the past two centuries is simply unscientific and primitive.>https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/menstrual-periods-are-arriving-earlier-for-younger-generations-especially-among-racial-minority-and-lower-income-individuals/
>>24975476Just because the age of the menarche has lowered thanks to industrial civilization doesn't give you the right to fuck children. This is attempting to derive an ought from an is. Empirically what you're saying is true, but you can't derive a moral claim from it. Try again.
>>24975449Changing age of consent laws wouldn't really make girls more interested in men they aren't interested in
>>24975476>Technically I can impregnate a child so therefore it's right for me to do soNot a great argument>>>24975452>Kids are too young to make decisions about their gender, gender surgery is satanic!>But when the sexuality in question concerns my base desires? Now it's perfectly fine and only an evil Jew would say otherwise!
>>24975457Having a hebe wife is a staple of western civilization and if you oppose it YOU ARE JEWISH!
>>24975483But women categorically are fine with having sex with older men. Especially if they have status/money. Tale as old as time.>>24975480>Just because the age of the menarche has lowered thanks to industrial civilization doesn't give you the right to fuck childrenThe point is actually that women who have arrived at menarche are just that, women, not children. >This is attempting to derive an ought from an is.I'm actually not even engaging in "ought" or normative language whatsoever. An adult is one who has gone through sexual maturity, which in mammals, at least, is indicated by the beginning of the menstruation process. What you want to say is that there are women who, despite being women, it is immoral to have consensual sexual relations with. I think you have to provide a thorough moral argument to support that position.
>>24975512>Technically I can impregnate a child so therefore it's right for me to do soActually I'm saying children are not even biologically capable of becoming pregnant. The fact that they are capable of pregnantion is the objective indicator that they are now women.
>>24975194This is the Bible for western elites.
>>24975513Couple this table with what other anon posted here>>24975476 and you're in for a real TRVKE
I've come to the conclusion based on years of observation that the true reason that /pol/acks hate Jews and elites is that they can fuck teenage girls with impunity and /pol/acks can't.
>>24975528True. Jews passed age of consent laws and "age gap" discourse to keep all the young girls to themselves. The sick bastards.
>>24975457>>24975463>>24975480Age of Consent defenders still can't provide an actual argument for why the age of consent should be 18 over say, 21. Or 25. There is no empirical basis whatsoever for their position, and they run entirely on feels. The scientific evidence regarding sexual maturity is clear, and it's not on your side.
>>24975530In the end it always comes down to pussy and who's getting it versus those that aren't. All of the window dressing surrounding it is just smoke and mirrors.
>>24975517Women are categorically fine with having sex with men they're attracted to
>>24975549True. I'm just saying women are attracted to money and status as much as they are physical appearance.
>>24975557Men with money and status who want to fuck underage girls already do
>>24975512What objectively differentiates a "girl" from a "woman" according to your philosophy? When is "consent" achieved by females?
>>24975521Girls as young as 4 have gotten pregnant before. If that's a woman to you you're being intentionally dishonest to justify your pathetic perversions
Even if the AoC wasn't a thing hot young bitches still wouldn't fuck the neets, spastics, and poorfags who post on /lit/ so I don't know why ya'll are so up in arms about it. The difference would be strictly academic for everyone in this thread.
>>24975483see piers morgan that is not true
>>24975409chess master
>>24975579That simply isn't true. My gf is 17 and we go out all the time and she loves the clothes I got her for Christmas and she loves me but she won't kiss or do anything physical because she said she doesn't want me to get in trouble with the AoC laws
>>24975598Your tulpa isn't real friend.
>>24975602I literally go shopping with her every weekday as soon as I get off
>>24975598>>24975607>anon is too stupid to realize he is getting rooked by a girl who will never give him even a crumb of pussy/lit/ is NOT the smartest board.
>>24975194I agree! The love between Quilty and Dolly brought my heart to tears.
>>24975610Why can't you accept the fact that women can and do love men much older than themselves?
I always picture Dolores as Ellie from The Last of Us.
>>24975194It's cuckshit.
>>24975476because children have an inability to consent. should children be able to sign contracts? should parents not be able to dictatorially rule over their children and decide how they grow up? should children be able to chop off their genitals simply because they want to?
>>24975355One day AOC will be 25 and leonardo decaprio will be remembered as the sicko serial child rapist.>>24975812After minors are physically matured they operate motor vehicles, work, pay taxes operate finances and sign contracts. Stop forcing the "children" vocabulary as if AoC bars "children" from abuse. There are millions of sexually active minors in west. What we have in the west is two free sex communities, but if there is cross interaction between these groups its an actual rape case closed. Sex with minors is not child rape (barring actual rape), its an overriding of consent by the state. Its absurd. A girl can have group sex with multiple partners but if one is too old, she was momentarily raped.... playing devils advocate here.
>>24975812You cant actually define "child" as opposed to "adult" without recourse to biology. So at what point is "girl" now a "woman" if not menstruation?
>>24975194fuck off joanne.also, YWNBAM, and hope you burn in hell for supporting the abortion lobby
>>24975409bu-ter-fly
>>24975868doesn't work mechanical due to fertility window, any civilization that does it is over in 100 years... speaking of which
Everyone talking about what is "natural" is kind of missing the point. Murder, rape, fornication, slavery, and cannibalism are all common enough in human history to be natural. One of the most damaging ideas in modernity is that man ought no longer order himself under logos, because his nature demands that epithumia rules. This is just a path to becoming a slave of the passions and ignorance.
>>24975389>boil in liquid excrementFuck off Rabbi.paedofreaks get the rope regardless though
>>24975385Age of consent laws are in place so young impressionable girls don't get spawncamped by creepy pick-up artist type horny groomers.
>>24976204Okay but what if you're a nice, sensitive, caring, loving gentleman?
>>24975194>love storynot love at all. it's about a weak man being manipulated by a succubus. adulthood is realizing she was a complete whore like every other foid on the planet.
>>24975194Alright, /lit/. Which is your favorite Lolita cover?
>>24975535Women have their healthiest children in their early to mid 20s, but age of consent critics always conveniently leave this data point out.
>>24976132>One of the most damaging ideas in modernity is that man ought no longer order himself under logos, because his nature demands that epithumia rules. This is just a path to becoming a slave of the passions and ignorance.Age of Consent according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church is 14
>>24976132Very strange for a catholicism (or Orthodoxy, but this is just a subtype) peddler to cite Slavery as a thing only following the Logos prevents when the churches were all and all completely ok with it until very recently. >>24976395Teens and Tweens suffer pregnancy complications at much higher rates than young women, iirc.
>>24976442the church(es) are not inerrant.
>>24976507A multi-millennia long error no one, not even Jesus, the disciples, or Paul, bothered to correct.
>>24976108b-u-terf-ly
>>24976689Reading anti-slavery positions into NT verses like you are John Brown doesn't count, by the way. If those statements can only be identified in hindsight they are worthless.
>>24975300Why did they re-legalize alcohol but not take the women's right to vote away or put niggers back in the field?
>>249754144chan has some smart mother fuckers, if you didnt know that, you would not be here now would you.
What did i say here
>>24975476based off the clock ready for cock chart>>24975812of course 18 and 21 year olds cant be brainwashed into chopping off their genitals, if we're waiting until people are actually super fully for realsies adult before they can consent to anything we're talking 28-31 years old, also trannyism should be outlawed
