Theoretically speaking, is the concept of AI reaching the equivalent of human consciousness just an amalgamation of algorithms or something supposedly more?
>>24976848What is human consciousness?There’s no good answer and yet people insist AI - which also lacks a coherent definition - can duplicate it through some process they give a name like “emergence” that explains fucking nothing. It’s incoherent undefined words three or four layers deep and people say them as if they just had a profound opinion about any of it and didn’t just expose their empty skulls with a brainfart.
>>24976868Indeed to even consider asking that question we must first try to define human consciousness first. But isn't the lack of definition something commonly encoutered basically everywhere? Words were always just approximations of ideas that varied between people and their different languages. Considering that do we not have an idea of said "approximation" on the matter?
