What's the most book-accurate Lolita cover?
>>24978660This old Penguin one because it accurately shows what a 12 year old girl might look like. Dolores would certainly look way younger than some of the ones in your pic
>>24978686She's 12 to 17 during the story but desu I still feel most depictions make her look either too young or too old.
Pedophiles will burn
12-14 year old eager sluts who have already lost their virginity would realistically look like this.
>>24978660Not a book cover, but I do love the 1962 movie poster of the book. Pic related.>>24978704The correct term is 'hebephilia'.
>>24978956Not a real poster either.
All the girl covers or cherries or butterflies or her panties are all so awful, no wonder all the normies have such a lazy reaction to it. I've seen a few of them that's just nabokov's face which are pretty funny, and one of hh's sweaty forehead which is better but flawed for the same reason as the little girl ones. I think there's one that's just a shot up of a clear sky, and looking up at some trees in the corners, but it should evoke that sense of american summer, lounging in the garden and driving down the roads with the summer breeze through the trees and such. i always associate that heat and yellow leaves with lolita. The one with her zoomed in lips reminds me of dorian gray instead
>>24978956>The correct term is 'hebephilia'.>You see, judge, I'm not a pedophile; I do not fuck children beneath the age of twelvePedophilia and intelligence definitely don't go together.
>>24981290>I'm not a pedophile; I do not fuck children beneath the age of twelveLiterally how it works though.
>>24981290Hebephilia and pedophilia are not distinguished on the basis of age, but on the basis of pubertal development.
>>24981300cute
>>24981300>>24981452This is a "kill them all and let God sort them out" moment.
