ITT: we post history books about less discussed topicsi'll start>western technology and soviet economic development 1930 to 1945 by sutton - about how the west essentially singlehandedly built up all soviet industry>wall street and the bolshevik revolution by sutton - about american financiers being covertly inserted into the soviet union to fund the bolshevik revolution
>>24981825Germans in Texas/Texas German>Gustav Dresel's Houston Journal>Roemer's Texas 1845 to 1847>Viktor Brach's Texas in 1848
>>24981848i always found it fascinating how germans (and japanese) instantly pledged allegiance to the US with the onset of world war two. they didn't create any notable underground resistance groups or sabotage infrastructure or anything, totally loyal
>>24981853Redpill me on this one. I’ve always been interested in the Scotch Irish in the US and Canada.
>>24981825>the main island of Hawaii is entirely owned by Chinese farmersHmmmmm
>>24981974i believe the scale is incorrect and also it isn't talking about chinese farmers
>>24981974This is likely just representing any chinese stakeholder in corporations that own some farmland. Maps like these are always sloppa and wrong about half of it. It’s showing military bases without any reference to how many there are in total and their distribution as well. Just creating a narrative
>>24982017>t. Chinese spyNot sure what this thread has to do with books baka
>BridgeAnne d'Avignon is a young genealogist who gained significant media attention around 2010-2012 for her research finding that almost all U.S. Presidents (except Martin Van Buren) are distant relatives, descended from King John of England, linking them through common royal ancestry
>>24981825Is Sutton reputable or is he a quack?
>>24982043he's fairly reputable for the most part, as in his overall arguments and most of his evidence is solid but there are odd inaccuracies here and there in small parts of the evidence he uses; for example, the numbers of a certain type of tooling used is this number and it's clearly stated in every reference but in his argument, the number he uses is totally different. i'm not sure what that's about but it doesn't happen often and it's usually just stuff about small details that don't make much of a difference to his whole argument
>>24982029the map isn't totally accurate, but it's not entirely false. i used it just because i didn't have any other pics relevant enough to the topic. also i thought it would be a nice addition to the topic, covert military operations and projects - one thing off the top of my head being that most major widespread technologies we use today in the west like GPS or the internet were developed by the US military
There are loads of military bases all over the country so this doesn't necessarily mean anything but that one up in North Dakota definitely has me convinced. No way that's accidental. Why do we allow state-controlled socialist rivals to buy land in our country, again?
>>24982087>Why do we allow state-controlled socialist rivals to buy land in our country, again?why do you allow all of your industries to be offshored to your state-controlled socialist rivals?
>>24982097Both are the result of neoliberalism and the uni-party. It requires a hard correction of nationalism and state intervention if necessary.
>>24982087>>24982097the truth that most won't admit is both are because of the increasing dysfunctionality of modern USG built from the FDR regime (which in turn, was built from the lincoln regime's changes to washington's USG). while it's certainly the case that our rulers are actively malicious and not merely incompetent, they're also gradually becoming far stupider than the ones from 100 years ago, which is saying a lot considering the existence of woodrow wilson.
>>24982120The real turning point was the 1890s to 1920s, particularly Wilson.
>>24982128i agree, by that point america and england were already locked into going down that path (and what much of the continent was doing was ideal for the time but ultimately temporal), but i'd say it was FDR who expanded upon those foundations to what they are now known as today. civil rights for instance, at least racially if not in terms of gender, likely wouldn't have gotten as far as they did without the gay race communists in his cabinet.
>>249819191/2I would highly recommend this book then. It has three parts covering the formation and migrations of the Scotch Irish: 1) life in lowland Scotland during before and during the 16th century, 2) migrations to Ireland and life there, and 3) migrations to America, settlement, and life there. It, unfortunately, doesn’t touch much on the Scotch Irish in Canada, but my understanding is that it was less numerous and spiked after the migrations to America. If I were to sum it up memory, the Scotch Irish were like a snapshot in Scottish history transplanted to Ireland and then America. Scotland was a pretty bad place to live in the 16th century: it was very poor and quite lawless. This poverty and lawlessness caused the Scot during that time to be self-sufficient and hardy. 16th century Scotland also underwent a huge religious transformation with many lowland Scots becoming ardent Presbyterians. Almost overnight, a largely illiterate and apathetic people became devoutly obsessed with Christianity and theology, spending whole days in gatherings that read and debated Scripture. They also fought for their religion against Queen Mary of Scots and other foreign influences during that time, to saying nothing of the Covenanters later who also migrated to Ireland. When James I and VI ascended the throne of England, the Ulster plantations were started in 1609. Many Scots from south of the Forth settled there, along with some Englishmen. Scots would continue migrating there throughout the -1600s. A lot of land was taken from the Irish and given to the newcomers, and the Irish never gave up that land. There was often banditry and small scale violence back and forth, not to mention the larger scale violence of the Civil Wars in the mid 17th century. Meanwhile, the Irish trickle back in to work the land again because their labor is still needed. Most of the Scots moving to Ireland are poor and looking for a plot of land to call their own. So, you already have the beginnings of a frontier mentality in hostile country being created by the Scots Irish, who primarily rally around their Presbyterian religion.
are there any good books relating the black nobility to modern day ruling families?
>>24982120>>24982128>>24982154Use your 2nd amendment right like a demon
>>249821582/2However, their religion came under threat more and more as the 18th century emerged. Since Presbyterians were dissenters and not a part of the established Anglican Church, they suffered legal disadvantages from the Penal Laws. That with rising rents caused about 250,000 Scotch Irish to migrate from Ireland to America in the course of several waves of immigration until about 1770, usually meaning a family had spent only a few generations in Ireland. Once in America, they largely went straight to the frontier and settled where they could. Their character is best revealed in contrast to German settlers. Anywhere the Scotch Irish went, the Germans were also there, either in large numbers in Pennsylvania or even in small numbers in Appalachia. The Germans were generally very law abiding and peaceful, treating the natives well. Meanwhile, the Scotch Irish were often belligerent squatters. They very much had an attitude of fuck you, this is mine. They very often caused conflicts with the natives by intruding on native land but they were also good at pushing natives out. The Quakers running the Pennsylvanian government were not happy with this because they made promises of peace and friendship with the natives that the Scotch Irish just didn’t care about. A further contrast: the Germans were generally considered quite civil and well kept while the Scotch Irish were much more uncouth, and honestly there are accounts of their living conditions just being dirty and lowly, which is a trait carried with them from the poverty of 16th century Scotland. Regardless, they were constantly pushing the boundaries and carving out their plots in the wilderness by their own hands. They were very much the stereotypical rugged frontiersmen, self-reliant and individualistically minded, barring dedication to one’s kin, another trait carried from. 16th century Scotland. They primarily came in through Philadelphia and either went into eastern Pennsylvania and then onto Ohio and beyond, or the hooked south into the the backcountry of Virginia and the Carolinas. They would make up a large portion of the settlers of Tennessee and Kentucky. They developed a strong reputation as Indian fighters, and this carried over into the Revolutionary War where they fought Britain’s native allies on the frontiers. Speaking of the Revolution, the Scotch Irish were almost completely in favor of it and filled the ranks of many Continental Army regiments. It’s estimated that they made up around 12% of the population in the colonies by that point. Beyond that, they developed a frontier culture, particularly as regards their religion, with traveling preachers constantly doing circuits beyond the Appalachians. Into the 1800s, they started mixing and melding in with the rest of America’s White population, except for notably isolated exceptions in the Appalachians where the worst aspects if their culture has been preserved and magnified by poverty.That’s about it.
>>24982204just because there's hundreds of thousands of disaffected young men across the western world doesn't necessarily mean another franz ferdinand moment is possible in the 21st century. on the one hand, the modern managerialist state has become increasingly efficient at replacing leaders so you'd either need a revolution or restoration (both of which require wealthy benefactors. even the latter isn't safe peacefully. see: waco, ruby ridge, etc). but on the other hand, the general public still views leaders as important despite the dismal reality of the situation. personally i think it's gonna have to come down to the global economy getting weaker before anything big can happen. we're making incremental, slow steps nowadays which is good but it's very understandable why people want things to go faster, we've seen how fast cthulhu can go in the past fifteen years.
>>24982192i am genuinely starting to believe that your social class is more or less predetermined. i've been learning a bit about the genealogy of modern day celebrities, industrialists and generally famous people, and it turns out that every single one of them is a descendant of royalty somewhere down the line. every single one.
>>24981825based, conquer us president Xi
>>24982234Literally everyone is though. Every US President except for Van Buren can be traced to King John of England. My wife’s family can be traced to Edward III. I can trace my ancestry for certain to King James V of Scotland in two lines, bjt my father was a drug addict and I was so poor at one time that I was counting pennies in my hand to barely afford shitty Chinese food on my lunch break from a retail job.
>>24982282yeah, i've heard of that but i'm still not convinced. literally everyone is descended from a tiny handful of people? i don't know. how did you trace your ancestry?
>>24982154can you give me a quick rundown on what FDR did, to a layperson who doesn't know anything about it?
>>24982294>literally everyone is descended from a tiny handful of people?It’s basically a mathematical certainty considering how ancestry works, and it’s something that is consistently shown to be true when the records can be followed. To save space here, this video does a decent job explaining it:https://youtu.be/BCXkzuGik_k?si=dr65tI8ZxPVVcoeDI think you see it most commonly with people of British descent because Britain was so thinly populated in 1600, with England having an estimated population of only 4.1 million people in 1600 while now there are over 200 million people of that descent worldwide. The chances of having gentry ancestry at that time is therefore much higher, and all you need is one guy out of the 65k theoretical ancestors you would have in 1600.>how did you trace your ancestry?It depends on where your family was from. If they lived somewhere like colonial New England, there already exists very good genealogical studies and resources on these people. Douglas Richardson is a good example of an academic who has traced royal lineage to American settlers. Where your family lived also affects how well records are kept. Colonial America, England, and Scotland kept good records for hundreds of years while Ireland, for example, did not.Anyway, the way I do it is I use modern census, birth, and marriage records to follow a paper trail back. In the locations described, it’s easy to go back to the 1700s and 1600s, and records often have enough corroborating information to distinguish people, so long as it’s not a Smith or a Johnson. Then I search several places to see if these people have sourced profiles and I check the sources for accuracy. At this step, I’m connecting my paper trail to already established and reliable genealogical research. You have to be careful and think critically though. There are many, many normies who have no idea what they’re doing and have unsourced online trees that make no sense, which they all just repeat forever. But if you find one guy of note who has already been well-researched, a gateway ancestor, then that can usually be followed and sometimes they have royal ancestry. Sites like wikitree are good if you check the sources for accuracy. Project protected profiles are the best and often note know mistakes or fraudulently attributed ancestries. Depending on the situation, I will go find my own visitations or peerage sources if I think it should be out there.For my connections to James V, I used modern records to trace back to 1800s Scotland, and these gave me good corroborating evidence to keep going. Marriage, military, and birth records, with good hints, brought me to the region of Sutherland and Caithness to clans that have ample genealogical resources. I cross referenced what I knew to confirm their places in certain pedigrees that lead back to Robert Stewart, Earl of Orkney and illegitimate son of James V.
bump
why is it so damn hard to find books about the 1975 lima declaration?
That image is incorrect
>>24981863Lots of Germans who left Germany prior to the start of World War 2 did so because they opposed the rise of Nazi ideology. Whether or not that was because they actually opposed the ideas or didn't like the idea of their sons being sent to die in useless wars for land they didn't give a shit about is irrelevant; the point is that a lot of them wanted the Nazis to lose in the first place.
>>24985191Those were a profoundly insignificant subset among the numbers of German-Americans. And largely actually jewish and/or communist.
>>24981863Happened in most of the New World desu. German Brazilians were also overwhelmingly obedient and loyal to Brazil and assimilation once the war kicked off.
>The rise of international jihad and Western ultra-nationalism>In the Management of Savagery , Max Blumenthal excavates the real story behind America’s dealings with the world and shows how the extremist forces that now threaten peace across the globe are the inevitable flowering of America’s imperial designs.>Washington’s secret funding of the mujahedin provoked the Russian invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. With guns and money, the United States has ever since sustained the extremists, including Osama Bin Laden, who have become its enemies. The Pentagon has trained and armed jihadist elements in Afghanistan, Syria, and Libya; it has launched military interventions to change regimes in the Middle East. In doing so, it created fertile ground for the Islamic State and brought foreign conflicts home to American soil.>These failed wars abroad have made the United States more vulnerable to both terrorism as well as native ultra-nationalism. The Trump presidency is the inevitable consequence of neoconservative imperialism in the post–Cold War age. Trump’s dealings in the Middle East are likely only to exacerbate the situation.
>>24982238You are a self-hating tranny
>>24982294Start with the Bible m8
