new statesmen must be really desperate for content or nepo hire gone wrong either way yikers

>>24985972
>yikers
foid take. disregarded.

the irony is /lit/ has gotten way less "elite" over the last several years, genre slop "generals" and a bunch of wannabe writers shilling trash. that article might have been funny/true ten years ago.

why are women so fucking stupid and annoying? if didn't have this stupid unconscious biological impulse to have sex with them i'd never want to be around one again.

>>24985966
Some people are built different, they are capable of having original thoughts. No amount of reading can teach you this, it doesn't matter if you're a Classics PhD or Anonymous.

>>24985979
>ten years ago.
at the latest. the election did a real number on this board

>>24985979
See, you say this but the fact is that the Gurm general doesn't even move the needle as far as this place being above Reddit, your third-year Greats class, Goodreads and local slopwit book clubs.