So? What did we think of it?
I don't know if he understands what this means.Did you read it?
bump
doesnt seem very appealing
>>24987130It was alright. The context of it is far more interesting than the material itself. Aside, the Sokal Affair is fairly well known so it's surprising that that fat fuck, the guy who lays out problems well but somehow always comes to the wrong conclusions, got away with ripping it off.
>>24986593>believes in materialism but also believes in equality and the blank slate and the noble savage and human perfectibility and inherent progress and rationality.
>>24988765>lank slate and the noble savage and human perfectibilityI haven't read the book but this doesn't sound like Slavoj at all. Are you sure you are not pulling this out of your ass?
unmitigated ass
>>24988765>believes in equality and the blank slate and the noble savage and human perfectibility and inherent progress and rationality.Kek
>>24986593>you vill haf a *schniff* sexually stable identity!
>>24988765Why do people to pretend they have a grasp on the ideas of authors they haven’t even read?