Which do you lean towards here with Being vs. Becoming:1. Mutual exclusion – Being and Becoming are incompatible; Becoming is illusion/error.2. Full symbiosis – Being and Becoming co-constitute each other; neither is prior.3. Hierarchical asymmetry – Being is primary; Becoming is derivative or degradative.4. Participatory asymmetry – Being is prior, but certain forms of Becoming can disclose or host it.5. Process primacy – Becoming is fundamental; “Being” is a stabilized abstraction.6. Nondual emptiness – Neither Being nor Becoming has independent reality; both arise dependently.7. Agnostic/pragmatic – The distinction is a conceptual tool with no final ontological answer.
This gay shit has never helped anyone with anything, in the history of humanity
>>24986919It sure helped me with being in your mom, she was becoming all over the place
>>24986934This shitpost is more worthwhile than reading 120000 pages of wank about muh being and becoming.
>>24986945It took me only 2 pages of your mom in a centerfold to wank, actually
>>24986704I think 3 and 4 are both right, and they dont mutually exclude the other but both can be true
>>249867041, 3, 4 is true. 5 is true as well but only in the sense of being and becoming as nominal designations. Becoming is the dual appearance of being, which is non-dual. Being emanates becoming as a hierarchy, with certain forms being closer to being yet not it.
>>24986953Great stuff
>>24986704Feels like this thread is as good a place as any to ask if someone can post the Chad being vs the virgin becoming meme
>>24986998Oh yeah and 2 is true as well, being and becoming are one in the same way a medium and a wave is one.
>>24986704It’s all language games.
>>249867048. There is only Becoming. Being is a fiction in a world where all phenomena is dependently originated (hat tip: Buddha)
>>24987135That's 3 and by describing rules that supposedly always hold you're still implying Being exists.
>>249867044, with shades of 2 and 5
>>24987135Yeah that's not from Gautama though, that's post sectarian Mahayana garbage. In the first place whatever is dependent and originated is illusory, it doesn't have ultimate existence.
>>24986704Bros language has no difference between ser & estar
