[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 17434433272.jpg (32 KB, 270x409)
32 KB
32 KB JPG
This world finds redemption not by being raised into myth (which it is not), nor by McCarthy finding the loveliness in all the ghastliness and in morally ambiguous characters. No, the only redemption here is found in the style in which it is evoked. McCarthy does not look away from the all the terribleness, both material and of the heart; he has little mercy to spare and doesn't flatter anyone with any measure of pandering. The heroism is purely in the evocation, a Heroism of Style.

He seems to be saying that all these characters and innumerable places that are evoked are alluring not because they validate some grander myth or some idea or interpretation, but because they exist.
>>
Bump
>>
>>24988335
Suttree is such a singular work in his oeuvre, and arguably his best. It’s the only one where both comedy and emotional pathos are communicated successfully to the reader, which is a very difficult balance to manage.

> He seems to be saying that all these characters and innumerable places that are evoked are alluring not because they validate some grander myth or some idea or interpretation, but because they exist.
Agreed.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.