[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1965.png (226 KB, 720x942)
226 KB
226 KB PNG
Tell me even your smallest opinion
>>
I think he's an eceleb grifter and you're pathetic
>>
>>24992595
Can you elaborate on that?
>>
>>24992601
Nothing more to be said
>>
His idea of antifragile is basically a restatement of "What doesn't kill me, makes me stronger"
>>
>>24992578
haven't read it, never heard of him

that's all we have time for
goo awhey noo
>>
File: Neutral.jpg (26 KB, 450x344)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>24992578
>Tell me even your smallest opinion
Fine, since you insisted, I have no opinions at all on the topic of this book or its author.
>>
>>24992658
whoa
>>
>>24992658
Yep. It's just a rebranding of physiological adaptation which isn't rare as he makes it seem. Muscles get stronger through work, as does your mind, tendons, immune system, etc.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.