[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Unironically a great novel
>>
>>24993453
It's better than the film but that's being damned by faint praise
>>
>>24993453
“Papering over shit movies trying to explain their plot holes and retard logic” is a wonderful genre. Alan Dean Foster wrote a decent book about his adventures (he adapted Alien, The Thing, Star Wars, Star Trek, Transformers…). They ignore him and he doesn’t get the scripts and only the vaguest outlines, they don’t want him on set, limited access to key information like the design of the monster in Alien. Truly the red headed step child of moviemaking. But the bean counters want the book ready to sell when the movie launches basically.

So they just make shit up. And their “explanations” of movies have no input whatsoever from the creatives, and they get ignored as far as canon goes. Which is why it’s funny that tie-in books have always had such a fanbase that insists that the book “explains” something about the movies or that it shows what the director’s real vision was or other crap. I’ve seen those assertions since the Usenet days.

Luckily these days nobody reads so all this shit goes into the pulp bin unread and undiscussed. Thanks for reading my blog.
Oh his book is “The director should have shot you”
>>
File: ph6ragkdwge61.jpg (128 KB, 640x1129)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
It's slop
>>
>>24993453
This was the first real novel I ever read. I was 14 and it was 2005. Before that I skimmed or pretended to read. This was the first that I read for fun. Good times. Amazing book. Better than the movie.
>>
>>24993661
Agreed
I really disliked the author’s pompous third person voice. It’s like a “gifted” high schooler putting on airs of being a great writer and churning out the most edgy trite fanfic imaginable. I don’t understand the love for this book at all

This shit got a fancy hardcover reprint.
>>
>>24993453
Grow up.
>>
>>24993453
The empire strikes back book is pretty good too. It stays close to the movie and does a good job of capturing the star wars magic
>>
>>24993718
Star wars books are better than anything written in the 19th century
>>
>>24993453
This. I also recommend the Darth Plagueis novel
>>
>>24996047
The Plagueis novel is one of the best things to come out of the entire franchise, at least better than all of the movies.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.