Is the book actually any good? Or is it just a basic novelized version of the movie?
>>24995174Fun things are not liked here, i don't think anybody will answer but thank you for posting it here.I didn't know this existed.
>tie-in for 1994 movie published in 2025 0% chance this is not dogshit
>>24995922I've noticed, kind of a bummer.
>>24995174Why would it be any good?Isn't it supposed to be a Steven King pastiche?
>>24995174>Or is it just a basic novelized version of the movie?Seems like it
Published 2025? Probably an AI wrote it
>>24997197https://echohorror.com/about-us/It's by a publisher that does film novels
>>24995174>it's realWhat in the fuck. I thought you were meme-ing on me.
>>24995174>>24997129Both cover and text seem AI made. Saw John Carpenter’s social media accounts shilling this shit, I wonder if he’s aware that this exists or that it was made by AI.
>>24997760The cover is the cover of the fake book in the movie
Reviews say it is riddled with spelling mistakes (Including character names), punctuation mistakes, sentences missing random words sometimes. Like it had 0 proofreading or editing done. In fact if you look at a photo of the back cover of the book it says>coming to a theatres near youWhich is a shame.
