We have:>Mein Kampf (1925) Adolf Hitler>Insdustrial Society and its Future (1995) Theodore John KaczynskiWhat completes the trilogy?Is there something since ISaiF that could possibly be as notorious? Somehow I don't think anyone has made a more extreme statement, even with all the deranged murderers' manifestos.Was there something between WWII and the Internet age that could equally stand out?
my diary desu
>Insdustrial Society and its FutureBoth not original, nor transgressive.
>>25000430>not originalNeither was Hitler's absurd race theory, he was just repeating a bunch of crap he got from other sources.
Hated by the West equally as much when the West was religious as now that the West is atheist. Also, unlike those two, hasn't been refuted by complete failure in application.
>>25000405>BAP>Ayn RandBrave New World? What?
Martin Luther: On the Jews and Their Lies
>>25000742
>>25000405turner diaries? it is dated, the other two notbehead all satans, kinda too deranged
>>25000468Eugenics is a good place to look, also U.S. racism>>25000752
>>25000438Not anything like the other two, as it's not a terrorist manifesto that Islamists want it to be. It's mostly commentary on Bible stories and commandments.
>>25000434These are both works that are notorious because of their authors. Very few people earn such infamy, and far far fewer still do advance ideas for ideas' sakes; further still, very few of the ideas themselves are essentially controversial, authors aside.
>>25000405Google will not even autofill your search for this one
>>25000770
>>25000405>>25000426My Twisted World?
>>25000823There are many flavors of shit what matters is the consistency. No one takes 99% of murder-manifestos to be anything worth refuting as their influence is secondary to the deeds of their authors except in the case of the Unabomber, where they are both equally notorious. It's an unfortunate thing that it's even on the /lit/ chart because it makes it either look like a meme or like a legitimate effort of someone worthy of study, where, the ideas it engages with are legitimate ideas, and the author is not a legitimate author.
>>25000405The label of "extremism" is one of the most slimy terms in politics, if not language as a whole.It means nothing, but opposition to the current regime.Take for example circumcision. You'd think the act of ritually mutilating toddlers would be seen as "extremism", yet it dodges the mark simply by virtue of being a practice favored by the aristocrats of the American empire.Whenever you see a person brings out the word "extremist", do know that you've met a sophist and nothing more.
>>25000920It's a toothy version of "radical"Need to meme "totally extreem bro"
in all seriousness, what is "extremely transgressive" about Mein Kampf?
>>25000924Rather "radical" is a more toothsome version of "extremist". Radical originally meant basically progressive
>>25000960>>25000964I mean in modern parlance
*blocks your path*
>>25000752>>25000812>>25000978Gay
>>25000426Maybe it hasn't been made yet.
>>25000405IYKYK
>>25000405>grandkid of Rothschild whiner book>Actual transgressive anti-civ/tech shit bookDon't put these two together.Your terms for "transgressive" are a little vague. Tales From the Crypt comics can go here. C'mon.
>>25001071It's been considered too edgy and censored off of the /lit/ list so I say it still counts
>>25001017??
>>25000792based and REDpilled
>>25000405Turner Diaries?
>>25000405this guy has a good list of em.https://www.anarchonomicon.com/p/the-anarchonomicon-real-banned-bookif you don't feel like reading a blog then here's the image itself.
