Kantianism is midwit philosophy. Nietzscheanism beats it as the high IQ philosophy
>t.
Nietzscheanism of any sort is a total scam. you're a gay fucking book reading faggot, not a doer of any kind, not a genuine human being that has a lived experience behind him. Get killed in a car crash.
>>25006167Nietzscheanism is just a poorly copied version of Egoism, which is really just Taoism.
Kant wanted of be a girl so bad. maybe the first documented case of AGP?
>>25006167Esoteric Wodehousianism is the truth. Cheerfulness and spats will return.
>>25006167Kant is peak metaphysics...Nietzsche is a pseud...if you think different...well then you are a pseud...it is in fact that simple...
Why do twitterfags make the effort to come and shit here? Go collect bap's moldy semen or something.
>>25006208Wtf?
>>25006516I think you’re a faggot. Simple as.
>>25006208No he didn't
>>25006167Classical Chinese and Byzantine thought is actually the ultimate high IQ zone. Trust me, I've tried them all.
>>25007231Based and Tao-pilled.
>>25006167not falling for this bait faggot. suck a dick.
>>25007231confucianism was created by high iq advisors to herd low iq cattlethe understanding that it's all bullshit was implicit among scholars
>>25006594pseud detected
There's a reason why edgy highschoolers have a Nietzsche phase and not a Kant phase
>>25009159Because Kant is what the school teacher believes. It's the square that wrote the square.
>>25007231>>25007447>high IQ>everything in it is a lielol>>25009159because nietzsche is easy to read and thus easy to misunderstand?
>>25006202Only you know how you managed to leap across those stones.>>25009159I picked those two up as a teenager. The verdict was quick: Kant is a formal philosopher and Nietzsche is a mystic who instigates his audience. The problem is that Kant doesn't have a single original idea. He might best be known for categorical imperatives, but he's just echoing Epictetus who introduced the idea two millennia prior.Nietzsche is worth a read for his aphorisms alone, while Kant could be better studied by not reading him at all and just going back to the Greeks who were far more readable, succinct, and cross-referential between disciplines. Theirs was a much more holistic approach. Kant seems deep at first, but he's really just rewriting himself on repeat.
>>25009204>because nietzsche is easy to read and thus easy to misunderstand?He didn't want to be easily understood, but he didn't want to use dense jargon to be misunderstood.
>>25009222>The problem is that Kant doesn't have a single original ideaare you fucking dumb you fucking faggot ?
>>25009234If you could disprove that statement you would have. You are an idiot. A feeble, helpless little idiot.
>>25009233>He didn't want to be easily understoodi never said he did
>>25009243>i never said he didAre you retarded? I'm not talking about you, I specifically referenced his views on himself. That's your last explanation. If you say one more stupid thing I'm just going to make fun of you until you figure it out on your own.
>>25009236just read the critique of pure reason... you will find a lot of original ideas in there... the whole book is new and original... it prepares for something even better
>>25009248>Are you retarded? I'm not talking about you, I specifically referenced his views on himself....to me, who knows all this stuff already you fucking pseud. i naturally assumed you were implying i believed the opposite of what you were saying or i was ignorant of what you were saying, because most human communication is implicit you fucking dumbass
>>25009255>quote an authors views>get called a pseudYou got sensitive too soon. You've outed yourself as a complete fool. Send me your address so I can Amazon deliver some wipes to clean up the slobber from your keyboard and armor you with a necessary safety helmet. And for God's sake, stop eating crayons.
>>25009261yeah my bad, i tried to interpret the intentions of a vegetable that spouts non sequiturs
>>25009266>i tried to interpret the intentions of a vegetable that spouts non sequiturs
>>25009261>Calls someone sensitive>proceeds to have a meltdownNietzsche was retarded, Kant, even dumber, but you’re not half the stupid nigger either one was.
>>25009338That was an A and B conversation. You can C your way out.
>>25009353I’ll leave you two to kiss now, faggot.
>>25009229>The problem is that Kant doesn't have a single original idea.filtered
>>25009459By his unoriginality. That's the point.
>>25009467cope
>>25009566You're free to find an original idea.
