Is experimental literature lame
>>25007460it's pseudslopif you're a pseudpiggy maybe you'll enjoy it
>>25007460kinda yeahhad a good run, some fun shit, but it slowly killed off mainstream interest in "serious" lit by denouncing anything even remotely conventional as "middlebrow"when that tension is gone all that remains is masturbation
>>25007460And an experimental lit writer, yes. If you use rigorous structure and decades of practice to create something insane, cool. Every half ass outsider art no punctuation in coherent slop piece? Pass.
All great books are experimental
>>25007460No, there are some great literary experiments that stand the test of time. But writing something experimental for the sake of it is lame. Same goes for movies.
>>25007460Yes
>>25007460"Axorilingne", dorp Aree BaBa. Tordingdong vo di flups. Though,; :::,,,;;;::,,,;;::? Red p00p arr raround, to mupwe boner; cherubs and dominions nowhere to be found.
>>25007460You should only be allowed to write experimental literature after your fiftieth birthday and only if you have already published at least 3 well regarded novels or short stories collections beforehand.
>>25007460Sounds like the sort of thing that might be very Sturgeon’s Law
