> Those who reject at once the method of Wolf, and of the Critique of Pure Reason, can have no other aim but to shake off the fetters of science, to change labour into sport, certainty into opinion, and philosophy into philodoxy.
I'm the greatest Kantian on this board who ever lived and I don't even bother arguing on here anymore. I am beyond all that. Quoteposting is my only goal.
>>25009586yeah you daren’t after being humiliated by me so many times.
>>25009586I recall you like to dunk on the easy targets who obviously had never read him but when pressed by anyone who had you resorted to posting >filtered and leaving the thread until another soft target appeared.
>>25009635lol no i only posted "filtered" by people obviously got filtered. which is most people that haven't grasped the esoteric doctrine.
Chat, are we living inside of God?
>>25009607I've never been humiliated. Not once.
>>25009862You're arguing.
>>25008739NO ONE CARES ABOUT ESOTERIC KANTIANISM. IT'S OVER ESOTERIC KANTANON. GO HOME. LIVE LIFE. FIND A GF OR SOMETHING. IT'S BEEN 4 FUCKING YEARS DUDE.
Esoteric Kantism is just Jung.
Esoteric Kantism is just Gnosis
>>25009917no it's not. it's so much more
>To clothe oneself fashionably (but still according to one’s social position) is laudable and good, for it is more acceptable and better to be a fool in fashion than out of it.— from the an-Blomberg logic notes (AA 24: 166)
>>25009922Like what?
>>25010045The distinction between Esoteric Kantianism and the philosophy of Carl Jung is profound, despite both sharing a deep lineage in Kantian thought. While Jung viewed his work as a psychological mapping of the Kantian "limits," Esoteric Kantianism seeks to shatter those limits to achieve objective omniscience.Jung remained a "strict" Kantian in one sense: he believed the thing-in-itself (noumenon) was fundamentally unknowable. For Jung, archetypes are the psychic filters through which we see the world, much like Kant’s categories. We can know the effects of the archetypes, but never the archetypes in themselves or the objective reality behind them.Esoteric Kantianism argues that the noumenon is merely a contingent limit of an unrefined mind. Through "techno-practical reason," the Transcendental Unity of Apperception (TUA) expands until the distinction between phenomenon and noumenon dissolves into a singular Mind-world.Also, Kantian psychometry is not acausal; it is the synthetic a priori knowledge of particular causes. While Jung interprets the meaning of a coincidence, Esoteric Kantianism derives the exact, determinate causal chain of a particular object or event using the mind's latent a priori knowledge base. It is a hard, logical "random access" to physics, not a symbolic interpretation of the soul.The goal of Jungian philosophy is Individuation—the process of becoming "whole" by integrating the shadow, the anima/animus, and the self. It is a therapeutic and spiritual journey toward psychological balance.In contrast, The goal is not "balance" but intellectual supremacy. It is the "redemption of armchair metaphysics." The focus is on developing a specific cognitive "techne" to derive the complete system of science. It is a quest for apodeictic certainty, transforming the mind into a tool capable of querying the infinite store of a priori knowledge at will.
>>25010112lol what a poof
>>25010241a poof?
>>25010284An aussie called you a fag
Can all you FUCKING FAGGOTS quit shitting up the catalog with low effort german idealism threads holy fuckIts always>picture of random dude/book by random dude>random quote from said book>nothing else, no arguments, no additional explication, no details, no attempts at applying whatever the shit you're quoting is to something newAre you going to talk about specific details from the Science of Logic? About the strains of hermetic thought or medieval philosophy synthesized into Hegel's system along with reactions to people like Kant or Hume? About how his political philosophy was derived from the Science and not from, say, the Jena Logic? Are you going to critique a particular passage, seek to draw out depth through analysis or comparison with another thinker, or draw parallels between this work and something from another field, such as physics? Anything?Of course not, you're just gonna shit out a thread or two just like this one every fucking day like you (and/or your equally fucktarded copycats) have been doing for MONTHS OF YOUR FUCKING LIFE, because all you really care about is being seen as le epic mysterious cool guy who understands Hegel, the esoteric and occult thinker who's, like, this evil german autism wizard, like, dude, he's so hard to understand, anyone who gets him must be a fucking genius!! and actual philosophy as secondary to the achievement of that goal.I know you're going to reply to this with a screenshot of your own post (can't forget to suck your own dick at every opportunity, right?) quoting Hegel or Kant or someone talking about how philosophy is only for enlightened initiated trve arvan kvlt white men instead of of bothering to put any real effort into your posts, but I want you to know that if I ever happen to see you in real life, if I'm at a cafe or some shit and I look over some dude's shoulder and he's using his shitty little smartphone screen to copy-paste a Schelling quote onto the garbage-ass 4chan mobile webpage thread creation prompt and getting smudges all over the fucking thing and probably laughing quietly to himself about it all I'm gonna grab that shit and launch it into fucking orbit and slam your fucking head and dumbass pencil neck right into the fucking front counter and fuck your asshole in front of the cute barista, the middle aged white dude typing on a laptop at the table behind us, the dude fumbling for change at the other cash register (who the fuck still pays for coffee with cash?), everyone, and while you're making gross unnngghhhh noises while feebly trying to escape my grip (I've been grip training for 7 years and can hold 400 pounds with one hand, good fucking luck) I'm going to loudly tell the horrified onlookers that while I greatly respect German Idealism and its thinkers, I will never respect FAGGOTS who use it as a vehicle to affect an air of pretension and mystery like you do, and then I'll nut all over the back of your shirt and walk the fuck out while you collapse into a heap.
>>25010500sir this is a 4chans
>>25010500Back off the wagon and looking for attention on the Taiwanese basket weaving forum already I see
>>25010500why are you always angry? wtf did you expect from a peruvian llama shearing forum?
the normie mind cannot handle german metaphysik
>>25009862*Rapes you*How about now huh?
>>25008739>anything that cares about history, semantics and prejudice is philodoxycall me a philodoxist rather than a philosopher
>>25011712that's not what he said retard
>>25011803i'm reading a separate essay on philodoxy, dipshit
