ITT: post good secondary literature. I'll start
>>25010766Honestly the worst book I have ever read. Complete garbage, a few bad medium posts published as a book.
>>25010811>t. seething bunkertroon
i feel absolute contempt for anyone who uses the word based unless they're lil b himself
>>25010766Isn't this the guy that thinks writing tweets is more important than playing with his son?
>>25011089Same guyHe has a chapter in this book about how ideology heritability studies justify reading Deleuze as a secret neoreactionary lol>Let us consider a psycho-biographical approach to understanding the ideological valence of Deleuze’s thought. Political ideologies are known to be heritable — probably somewhere between 30% and 60% heritable (Hatemi et al. 2014) — so an author’s family background must provide at least some clues about an author’s ideological center of gravity.>According to the joint biography of Deleuze and Guattari by Françoise Dosse (Dosse 2011, 89), both of Deleuze’s parents were ideologically conservative. Louis Deleuze was an engineer and small-business owner, before he closed-up shop to become an employee of a large aerospace engineering firm. Louis disliked the Popular Front, the left-wing coalition that came to power in 1936, instead favoring a relatively small paramilitary party known as the Croix-de-Feu. Originally consisting of World War I veterans, this faction was financially supported by French millionaire and benefactor of Mussolini>After the Popular Front came to power, Louis and his wife, Odette, were horrified by the empowerment of working-class people. The Popular Front passed policies such as mandatory paid vacations for all workers. Gilles recalls Louis and Odette disgusted to find working-class people on the beaches of Deauville, where the Deleuze family vacationed in Normandy. “My mother, who was surely the best of women, said that it was impossible to go to a beach with people like that on it”
>>25010766I never got around to this. It always looked like e-celeb 2017 era culture war shit to me.
>In short, I suspect that Deleuze chose to work with Guattari because Guattari was slightly retarded. Guattari was smart, but always falling deep into activist delusions & depressively disordered thinking. Deleuze was leading by example: support and create with the downtrodden, the sad, the failed, and the mentally ill, etc. — just never join their groups. Don’t flatter their sins, and do not under any conditions allow yourself to be roped into their clutches.The very notion of a “Deleuze-Guattari collaboration” must therefore be revised. It was not so much a collaboration as a pedagogical sponsorship by Deleuze, an experiment in tutelage based on a political ethic of Christian charity. Stable genius Deleuze knows privately that this gifted but depressive, womanizing, socially liberal activist is doomed to personal and philosophical dissoluteness, but he — a based husband & father — would turn the boy’s ideas into something special.If only there was a Deleuze to Murphy's Guattari!
>>25011089He has the same first name as me
