[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/lit/ - Literature

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


He really was a much better writer than Dostoyevsky.
>>
Intensifiers primarily intensify the speakers retardation.
>>
>>25013112
No one really disagrees with that in terms of prose. Russians outright find dosto’s prose to be bad.
>>
I found Tolstoy underwhelming to outright bad (Levin sections in AK). Dostoevsky meanwhile ranges from dogshit (Demons) to brilliant (Grand Inquisitor). I think I prefer Dostoevsky, especially since you don't really feel Dostoevsky's bad prose in translation.
>>
>>25013143
Russians are psyoped into hating Russian literature by being forced to read it in school at the age of 14 when noone can be bothered with it.
>>
>Has 200 living descendants
4chniggers could NEVER
>>
>>25013269
I imagine most of them are frauds
>>
>>25013112
He's the greatest ever
>>
Proto-bolshevik
>>
>>25013112
I favor Dostoevsky, but that's just objectively true. He was embarrassingly bad with money (reading his letters is like watching Safdie brothers movie) and never had the time to refine his work.
>>
>>25013118
Thanks for the tip Twain.
>>
>>25013754
That's Joyce
>>
>>25013143
i know russian but i read karamazov bros in a different language because what you said lol
>>
>>25013112
He was vastly better. His characters actually feel like real human beings and have some of the most complex characters development I have ever seen.
He can do that, while also making his books epic in scope and scale, and he does it so effortlessly, it's amazing. He really is the best novelist of all time, and one of the greatest writers to ever walk the Earth.

He's so good, he ruins literature for me. Nothing reaches him, in terms of relatability, other than Schopenhauer.
>>
>>25015623
read boris godunov by pushkin
>>
>>25015623
His characters have predictable russoid depravity and inner weakness while their "development" is typically just one from a set of variations on finding christianity. Permeated with vacuity, never amounting to genuine soul, walltexted ad nauseum.

At least Dosto is self-aware of this pattern to strike the lows with greater force and present the phony redemption as an unavoidable last resort instead of self-righteous pedagogy.
>>
>>25015623
>His characters actually feel like real human beings
The only character in literature that felt like a real human being to me is Leopold Bloom. Everything else reeks of artifice, including Tolstoy's characters.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.