Best works on ontology?
>>25013530certainly not any thing by that certified pseud whomst you posted
religion and nothingness
>>25013572fpbp.Just read the Eleatics and some Daoist works. You can discard almost all of Western philosophy desu, just so many people flapping their gums without saying anything meaningful.
>>25013530heidegger was an existentialist. existentialism =!= ontology
>>25013530Continental “””””philosophy””””” is for hacks, spergs, and retards. Usually all of the above. You have to be incredibly stupid to fall for this shit.
I'm so tired. What's wrong about thinking of Being? Of Throwness? What's wrong with it? They don't have utilitarian value? They don't abide by some kind of scientific industrialised logic? They're outside Thingness? Why must everything have to be produced and made 'transparent'? (Baudrillard). Like most great philosophers he never stopped at a bus stop of 'truth'. People are still talkimg within his works today. And yet some spastic on 4chan says 'lul retrofuted my some nigger I invented in my head'. Get a grip, faggot
^ schizophrenia. Not even once.
>>25013530>ontologyniggas need to be told what's real and what isn't
>>25014752Okay brownoid>>25015559Pic unrelated I guess>>25015564>if it ain't heckin basedence it ain't philosophy!>>25015588>muh mental illness!>>25015591Not the point of this thread
>>25015592>Not the point of this threadwhat else could ontology mean, if not what is real?
Solipsism is fundamentally correct. Only the self can provably exist. Any ideologies denying the self can be ignored. Any ideologies claiming the existence of things outside the self are axiomatic and must be held with that in mind.
I exist therefore I do exist
>>25015559He literally was not an existentialist lmaoThis board went to shit
>>25015599If you think that then your concept of proof is wrong.
>>25015599so Metzinger is wrong?
>>25015596I'm asking for relevant works on the subject of ontology. you can either offer texts or you can bugger off.
>>25017796>i would rather memorise useless erudition than discover the truthi know
>>25017849Thats not what I said you pedantic nigger
>>25017855it's what you implied. again, why would you want to learn what other people "thought" about reality when you have inherent mental faculties that tell you what reality is? surely you yourself know what is real and what "real" means?
It amuses me to see how many people are utterly filtered by anything abstract.
>>25017873No, it isn't.
>>25017897That's my bread and butter personally.
>>25017897>reality is abstractthe esotericists are esotericing again>>25017921it's what you unconsciously implied
